Abstract:Metrics derived from Twitter and other social media-often referred to as altmetrics-are increasingly used to estimate the broader social impacts of scholarship. Such efforts, however, may produce highly misleading results, as the entities that participate in conversations about science on these platforms are largely unknown. For instance, if altmetric activities are generated mainly by scientists, does it really capture broader social impacts of science? Here we present a systematic approach to identifying and analyzing scientists on Twitter. Our method can identify scientists across many disciplines, without relying on external bibliographic data, and be easily adapted to identify other stakeholder groups in science. We investigate the demographics, sharing behaviors, and interconnectivity of the identified scientists. We find that Twitter has been employed by scholars across the disciplinary spectrum, with an over-representation of social and computer and information scientists; under-representation of mathematical, physical, and life scientists; and a better representation of women compared to scholarly publishing. Analysis of the sharing of URLs reveals a distinct imprint of scholarly sites, yet only a small fraction of shared URLs are science-related. We find an assortative mixing with respect to disciplines in the networks between scientists, suggesting the maintenance of disciplinary walls in social media. Our work contributes to the literature both methodologically and conceptually-we provide new methods for disambiguating and identifying particular actors on social media and describing the behaviors of scientists, thus providing foundational information for the construction and use of indicators on the basis of social media metrics.

How Researchers View Altmetrics: an Investigation of ISSI Participants.

Scholarly use of social media and altmetrics: A review of the literature

Can We Count on Social Media Metrics? First Insights into the Active Scholarly Use of Social Media

Coverage and adoption of altmetrics sources in the bibliometric community

Interpreting "altmetrics": viewing acts on social media through the lens of citation and social theories

Altmetrics in the wild: Using social media to explore scholarly impact

Social media in scholarly communication

Altmetrics of "altmetrics" using Google Scholar, Twitter, Mendeley, Facebook, Google-plus, CiteULike, Blogs and Wiki

SMIAltmetric: A Comprehensive Metric for Evaluating Social Media Impact of Scientific Papers on Twitter (X)

How well developed are Altmetrics? Cross-disciplinary analysis of the presence of alternative metrics in scientific publications?

Analysis of the Characteristics and Influence Factors of High-Impact Papers that Common Concern to Researchers and the Public

A critical review on altmetrics: can we measure the social impact factor?

A systematic identification and analysis of scientists on Twitter

Assessing the Popularity of the Top‐tier Journals in the LIS Field on Twitter

How well developed are altmetrics? A cross-disciplinary analysis of the presence of 'alternative metrics' in scientific publications

Genesis of Altmetrics or Article-level Metrics for Measuring Efficacy of Scholarly Communications: Current Perspectives

Altmetrics: New Indicators for Scientific Communication in Web 2.0

Tracking the Digital Footprints to Scholarly Articles from Social Media

Validity of altmetrics data for measuring societal impact: A study using data from Altmetric and F1000Prime

Do altmetrics correlate with citations? Extensive comparison of altmetric indicators with citations from a multidisciplinary perspective

Usefulness of altmetrics for measuring the broader impact of research: A case study using data from PLOS (altmetrics) and F1000Prime (paper tags)