Functional Disruption of the PPR Protein SLG1 Affects Mitochondrial RNA Editing, Plant Development, and Responses to Abiotic Stresses in Arabidopsis
Hui Yuan,Dong Liu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-313x.2012.04883.x
IF: 7.2
2012-01-01
The Plant Journal
Abstract:The Plant JournalVolume 70, Issue 3 p. 432-444 Free Access Functional disruption of the pentatricopeptide protein SLG1 affects mitochondrial RNA editing, plant development, and responses to abiotic stresses in Arabidopsis Hui Yuan, Hui Yuan MOE Key Laboratory of Bioinformatics, School of Life Sciences, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, ChinaSearch for more papers by this authorDong Liu, Corresponding Author Dong Liu For correspondence (fax +86 10 62783603; e-mail liu-d@mail.tsinghua.edu.cn).Search for more papers by this author Hui Yuan, Hui Yuan MOE Key Laboratory of Bioinformatics, School of Life Sciences, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, ChinaSearch for more papers by this authorDong Liu, Corresponding Author Dong Liu For correspondence (fax +86 10 62783603; e-mail liu-d@mail.tsinghua.edu.cn).Search for more papers by this author First published: 16 January 2012 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-313X.2011.04883.xCitations: 84AboutSectionsPDF ToolsRequest permissionExport citationAdd to favoritesTrack citation ShareShare Give accessShare full text accessShare full-text accessPlease review our Terms and Conditions of Use and check box below to share full-text version of article.I have read and accept the Wiley Online Library Terms and Conditions of UseShareable LinkUse the link below to share a full-text version of this article with your friends and colleagues. Learn more.Copy URL Share a linkShare onFacebookTwitterLinked InRedditWechat Summary Land plants contain a large family of genes that encode for pentatricopeptide (PPR) proteins. To date, few of these PPR proteins have been functionally characterized. In this study, we have analyzed an Arabidopsis mutant, slg1, which exhibits slow growth and delayed development. In addition, slg1 shows an enhanced response to ABA and increased tolerance to drought stress. The SLG1 gene encodes a PPR protein that is localized in mitochondria. In the slg1 mutant, RNA editing in a single site of the mitochondrial transcript nad3 is abolished. nad3 is a subunit of complex I of the electron transport chain in mitochondria. As a consequence, the NADH dehydrogenase activity of complex I in slg1 is strongly impaired and production of ATP is reduced. When responding to ABA treatment, slg1 accumulates more H2O2 in its guard cells than the wild type. The slg1 mutant also has an increased expression of genes involved in the alternative respiratory pathway, which may compensate for the disrupted function of complex I and help scavenge the excess accumulation of H2O2. Our functional characterization of the slg1 mutant revealed a putative link between mitochondrial RNA editing and plant responses to abiotic stress. Introduction After the entire Arabidopsis genome was sequenced, post-genomic analysis revealed a large family of genes that encode for pentatricopeptide (PPR) proteins (Lurin et al., 2004). The PPR proteins are only found in eukaryotes and are especially abundant in land plants (Lurin et al., 2004; Fujii and Small, 2011). Arabidopsis and rice have about 450 and 477 PPR proteins, whereas animal genomes usually encode fewer than 10 of these proteins (Schmitz-Linneweber and Small, 2008). The PPR protein family is characterized by the signature motif of a degenerate 35-amino-acid repeat that is arranged in tandem (Small and Peeters, 2000). The PPR motif has two variants that are designated PPR-like S (short) and PPR-like L (long) motifs, with lengths of 31 amino acids and 35–36 amino acids, respectively. Based on their motifs, PPR proteins are divided into two subfamilies: the P subfamily has only pure PPR motifs, i.e. motifs without variants, and the PLS subfamily contains PPR motifs with variants. Most PLS subfamily proteins have extra conserved domains at their C-terminus, and these are designated the E, E+, and DYW domains (Chateigner-Boutin and Small, 2010). Two-thirds of the Arabidopsis PPR proteins have been predicted to carry a signal peptide at their N-terminus for targeting to plastids or mitochondria (Lurin et al., 2004). Based on their unique structural features, PPR proteins are hypothesized to bind RNA molecules, which has been confirmed in several cases (Lahmy et al., 2000; Meierhoff et al., 2003; Mili and Pinol-Roma, 2003; Nakamura et al., 2003; Hammani et al., 2011). From phenotypic analysis of the corresponding mutants, PPR proteins were found to be involved in diverse biological processes in plants (Saha et al., 2007), including cytoplasmic male fertility (Bentolila et al., 2002), embryogenesis (Cushing et al., 2005), plastid biogenesis (Yu et al., 2009), photosynthesis (Hashimoto et al., 2003; Meierhoff et al., 2003; Kotera et al., 2005), the circadian clock (Oguchi et al., 2004), seed and plant development (Kim et al., 2009; Sung et al., 2010; Hammani et al., 2011), and responses to ABA and stress conditions (Zsigmond et al., 2008; Liu et al., 2010). The PPR proteins have been proposed to participate in post-transcriptional regulation of gene expression, including RNA cleavage, splicing, editing, and translation. Indeed, the molecular functions of the most PPR proteins characterized so far fall into these functional categories (Andres et al., 2007; Schmitz-Linneweber and Small, 2008). RNA editing is an important step in the post-transcriptional control of organelle gene expression (Grennan, 2011). Most RNA editing in plants results in the conversion of cytidine (C) to uridine (U). RNA editing involves both cis-elements adjacent to the editing site and trans-acting factors that specifically recognize these cis-elements. So far, the trans-factors that have been determined to participate in RNA editing in plant chloroplasts and mitochondria belong exclusively to the PPR proteins. The first PPR protein determined to be involved in chloroplast RNA editing, CRR4, was discovered in 2005 (Kotera et al., 2005). Since then, more PPR proteins have been found to be involved in chloroplast RNA editing (Chateigner-Boutin and Small, 2010). For RNA editing in mitochondria, however, the first trans-factor was not identified until 2009, and it is the PPR protein Mitochondria RNA Editing Factor 1 (MEF1). MEF1 is a DYW domain-containing PPR protein and is required for RNA editing at three sites in the transcripts of Arabidopsis mitochondria (Zehrmann et al., 2009). Arabidopsis mitochondrial transcripts have over 500 editing sites (Giege and Brennicke, 1999; Bentolila et al. 2008). At this time, only 12 PPR proteins in Arabidopsis have been determined to be involved in the editing of 18 sites in 10 mitochondrial transcripts. Thus, research is needed to identify additional trans-factors so as to obtain a complete picture of mitochondrial RNA editing in Arabidopsis. In this study, we analyzed an Arabidopsis T-DNA knockout mutant slg1 that displays a phenotype of slow growth and delayed development, as well as altered responses to various abiotic stresses. Genetic and molecular analysis indicated that the SLG1 gene encodes a PPR protein with E and E+ motifs. Further study showed that SLG1 is required for RNA editing of a single site in the mitochondrial transcript nad3. Our work has revealed a putative link between mitochondrial RNA editing and plant responses to abiotic stresses. Results Identification of the slg1 mutant The Arabidopsis mutant slg1 (slow growth 1) was identified from a T-DNA activation tagging library (Koiwa et al., 2006). The mutant grew slower than the wild type (WT) throughout its life cycle. In the first 13 days after germination (DAG), the primary roots of the slg1 seedlings were about 30–40% shorter than those of the WT (Figure 1, and Figure S1a in Supporting Information). When grown hydroponically for 25 days, slg1 formed a less robust root system than the WT (Figure 1b). slg1 produced fewer lateral roots than the WT; at 14 DAG, the lateral root density was about 20% lower for slg1 relative to the WT (Figure S1b). The slg1 mutant was backcrossed to a WT plant (Columbia background) twice before further characterization. The phenotypes of the F1 plants were similar to that of the WT. Among the F2 progeny, the ratio of plants with the short-root phenotype to the WT phenotype was approximately 1:3 (44:120), indicating that the slg1 phenotypes were caused by a single recessive mutation. Figure 1Open in figure viewerPowerPoint Growth characteristics of the wild type (WT) and slg1. (a) Morphology of WT and slg1 seedlings grown on half-strength MS medium for 13 days. (b) Root systems of WT and slg1 plants after 25 days of hydroponic growth. (c) Root meristematic zones of 5-day-old WT and slg1 seedlings. (d) Expression of CycB1::GUS in the meristematic zones of 8-day-old WT and slg1 seedlings. In (c) and (d), Black arrows indicate the boundary between root meristematic and elongation zones. (e) Morphology of the aerial parts of the WT and slg1 at 25, 35, and 55 days after germination (DAG). slg1 has defects in both cell division and expansion during root development To determine the cellular basis for the defects in root development of slg1, we first examined cell division activity in its root apical meristem. The cell division activity is reflected by the size of the root meristem. Here, the size of the root meristem was defined by the number of cortex cells in a file extending from the quiescent center to the first elongated cell. At 2 DAG, the meristem sizes of slg1 and the WT were similar, i.e. both had 27 ± 3 meristem cells (Figure S1c). At 5 DAG, the number of meristem cells in the WT had increased to 32 ± 4, and then did not change in the following days. The slg1 mutant, however, had 30–40% fewer meristem cells than the WT (Figure 1c). To determine the cause of the low cell division activity in slg1, we introduced the marker gene CycB1::GUS into slg1 through a genetic cross. Expression of the CycB1::GUS marker gene specifically occurs at the transition period from the G2 to M phase (Colon-Carmona et al., 1999). As shown in Figure 1(d), fewer cells expressed CycB1::GUS in the meristem of slg1 than in the meristem of the WT, indicating that fewer cells in the slg1 meristem were undergoing mitosis. In addition to cell division, the cell elongation process was also altered in slg1. In the root maturation zone, epidermal cells were about 20% shorter in slg1 than in the WT (Figure S1d), indicating that slg1 also had defects in cell expansion during root development. slg1 has slow shoot growth and delayed development phenotypes The shoot growth of slg1 was also reduced. When grown in soil, slg1 had smaller rosettes than the WT at all times before bolting (Figure 1e). The rosettes of the WT attained their final size about 25 DAG, but slg1 rosettes required 35 days to reach the same size as those of the WT. During most of their life cycle, slg1 plants were shorter than WT plants, but the heights were similar at 55 DAG (Figure 1e). slg1, however, had no obvious defects in reproductive growth, and set seeds normally. slg1 has enhanced sensitivity to ABA and tolerance to drought stress Under normal growth conditions, slg1 germinated slightly more slowly than the WT. Twenty-four hours after seed plates were placed in the growth room, the germination rate was 90% for the WT but only 65% for slg1 (data not shown). After 36 h, the germination rates were similar for both the WT and slg1 (100 versus 97%). Because ABA is important in inhibiting seed germination, we determined whether slg1 has altered responses to ABA. On MS medium containing 0.5 μm ABA, germination was significantly lower for slg1 than for the WT only at 24 h (Figure S2a). On MS medium with 1.0 or 2 μm ABA, however, germination was significantly lower for slg1 than for the WT from 24 to 60 h, and especially at 48 h (Figures S2a and 2a). On MS medium with 0.5 μm ABA, the seedling greening rate was also significantly lower for slg1 than for the WT (Figure 2a), indicating that slg1 has enhanced sensitivity to both ABA-mediated inhibition of seed germination and seedling growth. Because salt and osmotic stresses can stimulate plants to produce ABA, slg1 was anticipated to be more sensitive than the WT to these two stress conditions. This was indeed the case. The germination rate of slg1 was significantly lower than that of the WT on a medium supplemented with various amounts of NaCl and mannitol (Figures 2b,c and S2b,c). The seedling greening rate was also lower for slg1 than for the WT on MS medium supplemented with 175 mm NaCl (Figure 2b) or 300 mm mannitol (Figure 2c). Figure 2Open in figure viewerPowerPoint Responses of the wild type (WT) and slg1 to ABA and various abiotic stresses. (a–c) Seed germination and cotyledon greening rates of the WT and slg1 on MS medium supplemented with ABA (a), NaCl (b), and mannitol (c). (d) Appearance of the WT, slg1, and F2 progeny with long (F2-lr) or short (F2-sr) roots, which are derived from cross between the WT and slg1. The plants were grown under normal conditions for 20 days, and then withheld from watering for another 15 days. Left, plants photographed at the time irrigation was stopped; right: plants photographed after irrigation was stopped for 15 days. Abscisic acid plays a crucial role in plant responses to drought stress by regulating stomatal movement. To investigate whether slg1 has altered tolerance to drought, we grew both the WT and slg1 in soil for 20 days and then withheld irrigation. After irrigation had been withheld for 15 days, the growth status of the plants was compared. Figure 2(d) shows photographs of the plants on day 20, when watering was stopped (labeled 'Before drought') and on day 35 (labeled 'After drought'). After 15 days of drought stress, all the rosette leaves of WT plants had wilted and turned yellow, while most parts of slg1 leaves remained turgid and green. Leaf fresh weights indicated that the WT lost water more quickly than slg1 (Figure S3). In the F2 progeny derived from the cross between the WT and slg1, the slow-growth phenotype co-segregated with the drought-resistant phenotype (Figure 2d), indicating that these two traits were controlled by the same gene or two closely linked genes. To determine whether the drought-tolerant phenotype of slg1 was due to high sensitivity of stomatal closure, we compared the size of stomatal apertures of WT and slg1 plants after they had experienced drought stress for 10 days. Before irrigation was stopped, stomatal apertures were similar for the WT and slg1 (Figure 3d,g). After water was withheld for 10 days, however, stomatal apertures were significantly smaller for slg1 than the WT, indicating that the high tolerance of slg1 to drought stress might be explained by its stomata responding more rapidly than those of the WT to drought stress. Figure 3Open in figure viewerPowerPoint Genetic complementation of slg1. (a) A diagram showing the relative position of the T-DNA insertion in the SLG1 gene. The positions of the primers used to confirm the presence of the T-DNA in SLG1 gene are indicted (LB3, F1, and R1). LB: T-DNA right border. F and R: the primers used for real-time PCR analysis of SLG1 gene expression. (b) Root growth of 8-day-old seedlings of different plant lines. (c) Appearance of 25-day-old plants of the different plant lines grown in soil. (d) Quantitative measurement of the size of stomatal apertures of the different plant lines before and after irrigation was stopped for 10 days. The asterisk indicates the significant difference from the wild type (WT) under the same growth conditions (t test, P < 0.05). (e) Seedling growth of different plant lines on MS medium, and MS medium supplemented with 0.5 μm ABA, 175 mm NaCl, and 300 mm mannitol. (f) Appearance of different plant lines before and after irrigation was stopped for 15 days. (g) Photographs showing the stomatal aperture of different lines after irrigation were stopped for 10 days. Molecular cloning of SLG1 Our genetic analysis indicated that the slg1 mutant phenotype was caused by a single recessive mutation. In the F2 progeny derived from a cross between the WT and slg1, all the slg1 plants were resistant to glufosinate ammonium (data not shown); because this resistance was conferred by the T-DNA tagging vector (Koiwa et al., 2006), this suggested that the mutant phenotype was caused by a T-DNA insertion. We then cloned the T-DNA flanking sequence using the thermal asymmetric interlaced polymerase chain reaction (TAIL-PCR) technique (Liu et al., 1995) and found that the T-DNA was inserted into the gene At5g08490 at 170 bp after the initial codon ATG (Figure 3a). The At5g08490 gene was then named SLG1. Quantitative RT-PCR analysis showed the absence of a transcript of At5g08490 in slg1, indicating that it was a null allele (data not shown). To confirm that knockout of the SLG1 gene was indeed the cause for slg1 mutant phenotypes, we introduced the WT SLG1 sequence back into the slg1 mutant under the control of the CaMV 35S promoter or its own promoter (a 2.0-kb sequence upstream of the ATG codon of the SLG1 gene). All the transgenic plants with either construct had normal root and shoot growth characteristics (Figure 3b,c). The transformation of the WT SLG1 also rescued the mutant phenotypes in terms of drought tolerance, stomatal closure, and response to ABA, salt, and osmotic stress (Figure 3b–g). Taken together, these results indicated that functional disruption of the SLG1 gene was responsible for all of the observed mutant phenotypes in slg1. SLG1 encodes a PPR protein The SLG1 gene contains a single exon with an open reading frame of 2550 bp that encodes a 95-kDa protein of 850 amino acid residues (Figure 4a). The encoded protein belongs to the E+ subclass of the Arabidopsis PPR protein family (PPR_5_2745209, Lurin et al., 2004). This PPR protein (SLG1) is predicted to have a mitochondrial targeting signal peptide at its N-terminus, 16 PLS repeats dispersed throughout the whole protein, and an E and E+ motif at its C-terminus (Figure 4a). Among these 16 PLS repeats are nine classic PPR motifs, five PPR-like L motifs, and two PPR-like S motifs. Figure 4Open in figure viewerPowerPoint Molecular characterization of the SLG1 protein. (a) A diagram showing the structural features of the SLG1 protein. Various protein motifs are indicated below the diagram. Among 16 pentatricopeptide (PPR) motifs, P, L, and S represent the classic PPR motif, the PPR-like L (long) motif, and the PPR-like S (short) motif, respectively. (b) Alignment of the protein sequence of SLG1 and its close homologs in other plant species. At, Arabidopsis thaliana; Vv, Vitis vinifera; Pt, Populus trichocarpa; Rc, Ricinus communis; Os, Oryza sativa; Sb, Sorghum bicolor. The identical amino acid residues are shaded in black, and similar amino acid residues are shaded in grey. The signal peptide for mitochondrial targeting at the N-terminus is indicated by a dashed line. Sixteen PPR motifs are indicated by a black line on the top of the sequences. The lines with filled dots and empty dots indicate the sequences of the E+ and E motifs at the C-terminus, respectively; the solid triangle indicates the T-DNA insertion site. A BLAST search using the whole length of SLG1 as a query identified its close homologs in many plants species, including Vitis vinifera, Populus trichocarpa, Ricinus communis, Oryza sativa, and Sorghum bicolor (Figure 4b). SLG1 shares high similarities with these homologs throughout the whole protein sequence, except for the signal sequence for mitochondrial targeting. This result indicates that SLG1 proteins are highly conserved in higher plants. SLG1 is expressed in all plant parts and is targeted to mitochondria Quantitative real-time PCR analysis showed that the levels of SLG1 mRNA were similar among roots, leaves, stems, and siliques but relatively high in flowers (Figure 5a). Next, we fused the SLG1 promoter sequence (the same fragment used for genetic complementation) to a GUS reporter gene and transformed this construct into the WT. All five transgenic lines that were examined for GUS activity showed the same expression patterns, and the results obtained with one representative line are shown here. SLG1::GUS was expressed throughout the seedling after germination (Figure 5b) and persisted during seedling development. In the roots, GUS activity was observed in the meristematic regions of both primary and lateral roots and in the vascular tissue of the maturation zone. In mature plants, GUS activity was detected in all areas of leaf tissues, including both vascular tissues and inter-vein areas. Expression of GUS was higher in old leaves than in young leaves. In flowers, GUS activity was detected in sepals, stigmas, mature stamens, the junction between silique and pedicle, and at both ends of siliques. Figure 5Open in figure viewerPowerPoint Expression pattern and subcellular localization of SLG1. (a) Relative expression level of SLG1 mRNA in root, stem, leaf, flower, and silique as measured by quantitative real-time PCR. (b) The GUS expression patterns in different plant parts of transgenic SLG1:GUS lines. Top row, from left to right: a 14-day-old seedling, a 25-day-old plant, root meristematic region of primary root, root maturation zone with an emerging lateral root. Bottom row, from left to right: an inflorescence, immature and mature silique, young and old stamens. (c) Localization of SLG1-GFP protein in mitochondria. Arabidopsis protoplasts were co-transformed with SLG1-GFP and mt-mCherry constructs. From left to right: green fluorescent signal from SLG1-GFP; red fluorescent signal from mitochondrial marker mt-mCherry; and merged micrograph of pictures with green and red signals. The TargetP 1.1 program (http://www.cbs.dtu.dk/services/TargetP/) predicted that SLG1 contains a 14-amino-acid signal peptide at its N-terminus for mitochondrial targeting. To experimentally confirm its subcellular localization, we fused the whole SLG1 sequence with a GFP gene. This fusion gene was transiently co-expressed with an mCherry-tagged mitochondrion-specific marker gene (mt-mCherry) under the control of the 35S promoter in Arabidopsis protoplasts (Nelson et al., 2007). The results showed that the green fluorescent signal of SLG1-GFP was co-localized with the red fluorescent signal from the mt-mCherry marker gene (Figure 5c), which provided direct evidence that SLG1 is a mitochondrion-localized protein. SLG1 is required for mitochondrial RNA editing To date, all the trans-factors identified for RNA editing in plant chloroplasts and mitochondria are PPR proteins (Fujii and Small, 2011). Because SLG1 is localized in mitochondria, we wondered whether it also participates in mitochondrial RNA editing. We directly sequenced all the editing sites of mitochondrial transcripts in the slg1 mutant. In the WT, 72% of the C nucleotides at position 250 of nad3 transcripts (nad3-250) were edited, but editing of nad3-250 was completely abolished in slg1 (Figure 6a). Meanwhile, the editing level of a nearby site, nad3-254, was unaffected in slg1. This indicated that the editing function of SLG1 was highly sequence-specific. The failure to edit the nad3-250 site converted the codon from TCT to CCT, resulting in a change from serine to proline. Because proline is a disruptor of protein secondary structure, the disruption of SLG1 function might greatly affect the structure of the protein encoded by nad3. In the transgenic plants of SLG1::SLG1, the editing level of nad3-250 was restored to the same level as in the WT (Figure 6a). These results confirmed that mutation in the SLG1 gene was responsible for the defect of mitochondrial RNA editing in the slg1 mutant. The corresponding site of Arabidopsis nad3-250 in rice is also an editing site. Comparison of the sequences surrounding this editing site of the nad3 genes from Arabidopsis, sorghum, and rice indicated that they are almost identical (Figure 6b), suggesting that SLG1 and its homologs in other plant species may recognize similar cis-elements involved in RNA editing. Figure 6Open in figure viewerPowerPoint Editing status of nad3-250 in different plant lines and part of cDNA sequences around nad3-250 sites in three plant species. (a) Complementary DNA sequence traces around the editing site nad3-250 of wild type (WT), slg1, and SLG::SLG1 lines. Arrows indicate the nad3-250 editing site, which is abolished in slg1. The asterisk indicates the nad3-254 editing site, which is unaffected in slg1. (b) Alignment of the cDNA sequences that form part of the nad3 transcript around the editing site nad3-250, which is shown in red, from Arabidopsis thaliana (At), Sorghum bicolor (Sb), and Oryza sativa (Os). Complex I activity and energy production is impaired in slg1 Mitochondria are the site of energy production through oxidative phosphorylation. The completion of oxidative phosphorylation depends on electron transport along the electron transport chain. In plants, like in animals, the electron transport chain consists of four complexes, named complexes I–IV. Complex I is a NADH dehydrogenase in which the electron is transferred from NADH to ubiquinone and then starts the whole electron transport process. Plant mitochondrion complex I includes more than 40 subunits, nine of which are encoded by nad genes, including nad3 (Heazlewood et al., 2003). To determine whether the defect in RNA editing of nad3 affected the function of complex I, we compared the NADH dehydrogenase activity of complex I between slg1 and the WT. As shown in Figure 7(a), the enzyme activity of complex I in slg1 was dramatically reduced; in contrast, this enzyme activity was completely recovered in complementation lines. To determine whether the impaired complex I function would affect the production of ATP, we then directly compared the levels of ATP between the WT and slg1. As expected, at both 10 and 30 DAG, the level of ATP was about 50% lower in slg1 than in the WT (Figure 7b). Figure 7Open in figure viewerPowerPoint The NADH dehydrogenase activity of complex I and ATP production in the wild type (WT) and slg1. (a) Proteins of crude membrane extracted from 8-day-old seedlings were solubilized with 1% dodecyl maltoside and resolved by Blue Native-PAGE. Left, Coomassie blue-stained protein complexes after electrophoresis; right, in-gel assays for NADH dehydrogenase activity in the presence of NADH and nitroblue tetrazolium (NBT). The top three bands indicated by arrows represent the enzyme activity of the mixture of complex I and III (I+III), complex I (I), and a partially assembled complex I (subcomplex I, sub I). (b) The ATP content in 10- and 30-day-old WT and slg1 plants. Asterisks indicate the value that is significantly different from that of the WT under the same growth conditions (t-test, P < 0.05). FW, fresh weight. An alternative respiratory pathway is activated in slg1 Mitochondrial electron transport has also been hypothesized to be involved in the production of reactive oxygen species (ROS), which can cause oxidative damage to thylakoid membranes and other cellular components but which can also serve as signaling molecules that help plants adapt to stress conditions. We therefore compared the levels of one of the ROS molecules, H2O2, in the guard cells of the WT and slg1. Under normal growth conditions, H2O2 content in the guard cells was similar in the WT and slg1 (Figure 8a); when the leaves were treated with 50 μm ABA, however, stomatal apertures were smaller and H2O2 levels in guard cells were higher in slg1 than in the WT. Figure 8Open in figure viewerPowerPoint Levels of H2O2 in guard cells and relative expression of alternative pathway genes in the wild type (WT) and slg1. (a) The H2O2 levels in guard cells of the WT and slg1 without (CK) or with treatment of 50 μm ABA. (b) Relative expression levels of nine genes involved in the alternative respiratory pathway in the WT and slg1. Asterisks indicate the values that are significantly different from that of the WT under the same growth conditions (t-test, P < 0.05). When the electron transport chain malfunctions in plants, an alternative respiratory pathway can be activated. The activated alternative pathway not only partially compensates for the functions of the impaired complexes of the electron transport chain, but it also helps scavenge the excess ROS, and it thus reduces ROS toxicity (Rhoads and Subbaiah, 2007). The components of this alternative respiratory pathway include several alternative NAD(P)H dehydrogenases (NDs) and alternative oxidases (AOXs). It has been reported that loss of function of complex I could increase transcript levels of the components involved in the alternative respiratory pathway (Pineau et al., 2005; de Longevialle et al., 2007; Koprivova et al., 2010). In this study, we examined the transcript levels of six ND genes and three AOX genes by quantitative real-time PCR. The expression levels of six of nine genes examined in slg1 increased significantly (2- to 20-fold) relative to the WT (Figure 8b). These results demonstrated that the alternative respiratory pathway was activated in slg1, further supporting the notion that the function of complex I was partially impaired in slg1. Discussion In this study, we have characterized an Arabidopsis mutant that grows slowly and has delayed development as well as altered responses to abiotic stresses. These mutant phenotypes are caused by the functional disruption of a PPR protein that is required for mitochondrial RNA editing. To date, all the trans-factors identified for organelle RNA editing are members of the E and DYW subclasses of PPR proteins, except for PPR596, which is in the P class (Doniwa et al., 2010). The functional disruption of these PPR proteins has been found to affect editing on only one to three editing sites, and on only one site in most cases (Takenaka, 2010; Fuj