Abstract: It is not clear yet why ADAM-alike adaptive gradient algorithms suffer from worse generalization performance than SGD despite their faster training speed. This work aims to provide understandings on this generalization gap by analyzing their local convergence behaviors. Specifically, we observe the heavy tails of gradient noise in these algorithms. This motivates us to analyze these algorithms through their Levy-driven stochastic differential equations (SDEs) because of the similar convergence behaviors of an algorithm and its SDE. Then we establish the escaping time of these SDEs from a local basin. The result shows that (1) the escaping time of both SGD and ADAM~depends on the Radon measure of the basin positively and the heaviness of gradient noise negatively; (2) for the same basin, SGD enjoys smaller escaping time than ADAM, mainly because (a) the geometry adaptation in ADAM~via adaptively scaling each gradient coordinate well diminishes the anisotropic structure in gradient noise and results in larger Radon measure of a basin; (b) the exponential gradient average in ADAM~smooths its gradient and leads to lighter gradient noise tails than SGD. So SGD is more locally unstable than ADAM~at sharp minima defined as the minima whose local basins have small Radon measure, and can better escape from them to flatter ones with larger Radon measure. As flat minima here which often refer to the minima at flat or asymmetric basins/valleys often generalize better than sharp ones~\cite{keskar2016large,he2019asymmetric}, our result explains the better generalization performance of SGD over ADAM. Finally, experimental results confirm our heavy-tailed gradient noise assumption and theoretical affirmation.

Regularization Effect of Fast Gradient Sign Method and its Generalization

Bag of Tricks for FGSM Adversarial Training

Robust Single-step Adversarial Training with Regularizer

FCGSM: Fast Conjugate Gradient Sign Method for Adversarial Attack on Image Classification

The Regularization Effects of Anisotropic Noise in Stochastic Gradient Descent.

On Generalization Error Bounds of Noisy Gradient Methods for Non-Convex Learning

Penalizing Gradient Norm for Efficiently Improving Generalization in Deep Learning.

Penalizing Gradient Norm for Efficiently Improving Generalization in Deep Learning

Towards Robust Training of Neural Networks by Regularizing Adversarial Gradients

Generalization Error Analysis of Neural networks with Gradient Based Regularization

Regularized Gauss-Newton for Optimizing Overparameterized Neural Networks

Stochastic Gradient Descent Introduces an Effective Landscape-Dependent Regularization Favoring Flat Solutions

Towards Theoretically Understanding Why Sgd Generalizes Better Than Adam in Deep Learning

Generalization by design: Shortcuts to Generalization in Deep Learning

Stability Analysis and Generalization Bounds of Adversarial Training

GSDAR: a Fast Newton Algorithm for ℓ _0 Regularized Generalized Linear Models with Statistical Guarantee

Adaptive Gradient Regularization: A Faster and Generalizable Optimization Technique for Deep Neural Networks

The Implicit Regularization for Adaptive Optimization Algorithms on Homogeneous Neural Networks

Regularization for Adversarial Robust Learning

Risk Bounds of Accelerated SGD for Overparameterized Linear Regression

Characterizing Model Robustness via Natural Input Gradients