Abstract:Most learning-to-rank recommendation models assume users prefer interacted items more than non-interacted ones. All non-interacted items have the same chance to be selected as negative samples. However, the observed interaction data usually shows long-tailed distributions, making traditional recommendation models trained on such data tend to rank popular items higher than users' true preference and degrading the performance of recommender systems. Some existing debias methods focus on eliminating such popularity bias, while simply removing all the popularity bias may diminish recommendation accuracy because popularity also contains some useful information implying item attractiveness, making it pivotal to handling popularity bias in proper ways. In this paper, popularity is recognized to have both positive and negative effects on recommendation. The positive effect of popularity should be amplified while the negative effect should be mitigated. Therefore, this paper proposes two novel schemes to distinguish the positive and negative impact of popularity in learning-to-rank models. First, we propose a popular-weighted sampler to sample non-interacted popular items from users' collaborative items as negative samples with higher probabilities. We believe that if a popular item is collaboratively similar to a user but not interacted with by him, it is more likely to be a true negative sample for the user. We sample such items with higher probabilities to mitigate the harmful negative popularity bias. Second, popularity could be a significant indicator of items' intrinsic quality. Hence, we design a popularity regularization scheme to capture item attractiveness, prompting cold-start users to prefer popular items. Finally, we conduct extensive experiments to evaluate the performance of the proposed schemes. Experimental results demonstrate that our approach can improve existing learning-to-rank models' performance and outperform state-of-the-art debias methods.

Addressing Class-Imbalance Problem in Personalized Ranking

A Biased Sampling Method for Imbalanced Personalized Ranking

Personalized Ranking with Importance Sampling.

Rankmbpr: Rank-Aware Mutual Bayesian Personalized Ranking For Item Recommendationl

Improved Estimation of Ranks for Learning Item Recommenders with Negative Sampling

Training Recommenders over Large Item Corpus with Importance Sampling

Sampler Design for Bayesian Personalized Ranking by Leveraging View Data

Learning-to-rank debias with popularity-weighted negative sampling and popularity regularization

VAE*: A Novel Variational Autoencoder via Revisiting Positive and Negative Samples for Top-N Recommendation

Revisiting Negative Sampling Vs. Non-sampling in Implicit Recommendation

Alpha-Beta Sampling for Pairwise Ranking in One-Class Collaborative Filtering

Towards Deeper Insights into Deep Learning from Imbalanced Data.

Optimizing Top-N Collaborative Filtering Via Dynamic Negative Item Sampling

Evaluating Performance and Bias of Negative Sampling in Large-Scale Sequential Recommendation Models

Learning Recommenders for Implicit Feedback with Importance Resampling

Cross Pairwise Ranking for Unbiased Item Recommendation

Batch-Mix Negative Sampling for Learning Recommendation Retrievers

Enhancing Recommender Systems: A Strategy to Mitigate False Negative Impact

RankSim: Ranking Similarity Regularization for Deep Imbalanced Regression

Unbiased Pairwise Learning to Rank in Recommender Systems

ABNS: Association-based negative sampling for collaborative filtering