The interictal suppression hypothesis is the dominant differentiator of seizure onset zones in focal epilepsy
Derek J Doss,Jared S Shless,Sarah K Bick,Ghassan S Makhoul,Aarushi S Negi,Camden E Bibro,Rohan Rashingkar,Abhijeet Gummadavelli,Catie Chang,Martin J Gallagher,Robert P Naftel,Shilpa B Reddy,Shawniqua Williams-Roberson,Victoria L Morgan,Graham W Johnson,Dario J Englot
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awae189
IF: 14.5
2024-06-16
Brain
Abstract:Successful surgical treatment of drug-resistant epilepsy traditionally relies on the identification of seizure onset zones (SOZs). Connectome-based analyses of electrographic data from stereo electroencephalography (SEEG) may empower improved detection of SOZs. Specifically, connectome-based analyses based on the Interictal Suppression Hypothesis (ISH) posit that when the patient is not having a seizure, SOZs are inhibited by non-SOZs through high inward connectivity and low outward connectivity. However, it is not clear whether there are other motifs that can better identify potential SOZs. Thus, we sought to use unsupervised machine learning to identify network motifs that elucidate SOZs and investigate if there is another motif that outperforms the ISH. Resting-state SEEG data from 81 patients with drug-resistant epilepsy undergoing a pre-surgical evaluation at Vanderbilt University Medical Center were collected. Directed connectivity matrices were computed using the alpha band (8-12Hz). Principal component analysis (PCA) was performed on each patient's connectivity matrix. Each patient's components were analyzed qualitatively to identify common patterns across patients. A quantitative definition was then used to identify the component that most closely matched the observed pattern in each patient. A motif characteristic of the Interictal Suppression Hypothesis (high-inward and low-outward connectivity) was present in all individuals and found to be the most robust motif for identification of SOZs in 64/81 (79%) patients. This principal component demonstrated significant differences in SOZs compared to non-SOZs. While other motifs for identifying SOZs were present in other patients, they differed for each patient, suggesting that seizure networks are patient specific, but the ISH is present in nearly all networks. We discovered that a potentially suppressive motif based on the Interictal Suppression Hypothesis was present in all patients, and it was the most robust motif for SOZs in 79% of patients. Each patient had additional motifs that further characterized SOZs, but these motifs were not common across all patients. This work has the potential to augment clinical identification of SOZs to improve epilepsy treatment.
neurosciences,clinical neurology