Cellular Response to Proton Irradiation: A Simulation Study with TOPAS-nBio

Hongyu Zhu,Aimee L. McNamara,Stephen J. McMahon,Jose Ramos-Mendez,Nicholas T. Henthorn,Bruce Faddegon,Kathryn D. Held,Joseph Perl,Junli Li,Harald Paganetti,Jan Schuemann
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1667/RR15531.1
2020-01-01
Radiation Research
Abstract:The cellular response to ionizing radiation continues to be of significant research interest in cancer radiotherapy, and DNA is recognized as the critical target for most of the biologic effects of radiation. Incident particles can cause initial DNA damages through physical and chemical interactions within a short time scale. Initial DNA damages can undergo repair via different pathways available at different stages of the cell cycle. The misrepair of DNA damage results in genomic rearrangement and causes mutations and chromosome aberrations, which are drivers of cell death. This work presents an integrated study of simulating cell response after proton irradiation with energies of 0.5-500 MeV (LET of 60-0.2 keV/mu m). A model of a whole nucleus with fractal DNA geometry was implemented in TOPAS-nBio for initial DNA damage simulations. The default physics and chemistry models in TOPAS-nBio were used to describe interactions of primary particles, secondary particles, and radiolysis products within the nucleus. The initial DNA double-strand break (DSB) yield was found to increase from 6.5 DSB/Gy/Gbp at low-linear energy transfer (LET) of 0.2 keV/mu m to 21.2 DSB/Gy/Gbp at high LET of 60 keV/mu m. A mechanistic repair model was applied to predict the characteristics of DNA damage repair and dose response of chromosome aberrations. It was found that more than 95% of the DSBs are repaired within the first 24 h and the misrepaired DSB fraction increases rapidly with LET and reaches 15.8% at 60 keV/mu m with an estimated chromosome aberration detection threshold of 3 Mbp. The dicentric and acentric fragment yields and the dose response of micronuclei formation after proton irradiation were calculated and compared with experimental results. (C) 2020 by Radiation Research society
What problem does this paper attempt to address?