Abstract:Focusing on the moral hazard of third-party environmental service providers in monitoring and controlling the emission of pollutants by enterprises, this paper takes the third-party governance of environmental pollution under the incentive-and-constraint mechanism as its research object. It also constructs a game model involving emission-producing enterprises producing emissions, third-party environmental service providers, and local governments. Adopting this evolutionary game model, this paper analyzes the mechanism of local government's role in effectively resolving the moral hazard between emission-producing enterprises producing emissions and third-party environmental service providers by exploring the conditions of spontaneous cooperation between emission-producing enterprises producing emissions and third-party environmental service providers. This paper provides a possible solution to the problem of emission-producing enterprises or third-party environmental service providers stealing and leaking emissions, as well as collusion between the two. The study presents two major findings. (1) There are three possible scenarios of breach of contract: unilateral breach by third-party environmental service providers, unilateral breach by emissions-producing enterprises, and collusion between the two. When a third-party environmental service provider unilaterally breaches a contract, emission-producing enterprises have regulatory responsibilities toward them. In such cases, local governments should reduce the penalties imposed on emission-producing enterprises. This measure would decrease the willingness of these enterprises to allocate a higher proportion of collusion payments to third-party environmental service providers. However, it would simultaneously provide a new avenue through which third-party environmental service providers would gain benefits, thereby increasing their expected gains from collusion. This would create a new game between the two parties, leading to the failure of collusion negotiations. (2) The efficacy of incentive-constraint mechanisms is influenced by the severity of contractual breaches, represented by the magnitude of stealing and leaking emissions. When false emissions reduction is at a high level, increasing the incentives for emission-producing enterprises and third-party environmental service providers cannot effectively prevent collusion; when the level is moderate, incentives for third-party environmental service providers can effectively prevent collusion, but incentives for emission-producing enterprises cannot; when the level is low, increasing the incentives for emission-producing enterprises and third-party environmental service providers can help prevent collusion. (3) When emission-producing enterprises engage in unilateral discharge, if a local government's incentive for third-party environmental service providers exceeds the benefits it can obtain from regulating the discharged amount, third-party environmental service providers tacitly approve the company's discharge behavior. However, with the strengthening of local government regulations, emission-producing enterprises tend to engage in more clandestine discharging of pollutants to obtain greater rewards. This practice infringes upon the revenue of third-party environmental service providers, as their earnings are positively correlated with the amount of pollution abated. Third-party environmental service providers no longer acquiesce to corporate emissions theft, resulting in an increase in the probability of the detection of emission-producing enterprises' illicit discharges; in this way, the behavior of these enterprises is regulated.

The Integration Role of Governmental Information Disclosure Platform

An evolutionary game study on the collaborative governance of environmental pollution: from the perspective of regulatory capture

The Role of Social Media in Promoting Information Disclosure on Environmental Incidents: An Evolutionary Game Theory Perspective

Corporate environmental disclosure and local government environmental oversight in China

Punishment or reward? Environmental information disclosure in Chinese listed companies based on evolutionary game systems

Research on evolutionary game of environmental accounting information disclosure from the perspective of multi-agent

The Power of Public Oversight: The Effects of Environmental Agency Information Disclosure on Environmental Investment by Polluting Enterprises

The Impact of Environmental Regulations on Enterprise Pollution Emission from the Perspective of "Overseeing the Government"

Evolutionary game analysis on industrial pollution control of local government in China

Challenging the nexus of power: The gaming dilemma of collaboration between government and enterprises in environmental management

Evolutionary Game Analysis of Risk in Third-Party Environmental Governance

The Relationship among Government, Enterprise, and Public in Environmental Governance from the Perspective of Multi-Player Evolutionary Game

Evolutionary Game Analysis of Environmental Regulation Strategy Between Local Governments

Strategic Dynamics of Local Governments in Regional Collaborative Governance:An Evolutionary Game Theory Analysis of Haze Pollution Response in the Fen-Wei Plain, China

Understanding local government’s information disclosure in China’s environmental project construction from the dual-pressure perspective

Implementation of a multi-agent environmental regulation strategy under Chinese fiscal decentralization: An evolutionary game theoretical approach

Environmental Regulation and Carbon Emissions: New Mechanisms in Game Theory

Information, Incentives, and Environmental Governance: Evidence from China's Ambient Air Quality Standards

Incentives for Corporate Environmental Information Disclosure in China: Public Media Pressure, Local Government Supervision and Interactive Effects

Invisible economy, performance assessment of local governments, and environmental regulation in China