Abstract:Recent advances in information technology have led to the extensive use of electronic maps in navigation tasks. An important question is how to present information about locations and directions to facilitate navigation tasks performed by different users. Extensive studies in the literature have investigated the effect of the frame of reference (i.e., North-Up and Track-Up Electronic Maps) on navigation performance but found disparate results regarding the best type of maps to optimize performance (Aretz & Wickens, 1992; Cuevas, Huthman, Knudsen, and Wei, 2001). The field dependence-independence (FDI), as one of the cognitive styles, has been found to affect an individual’s way of orienting in virtual environments but not their performance in orienting tasks (Kroutter, 2010). However, few studies have been carried out to research how users’ cognitive styles interacted with map characteristics, which in turn influenced their navigation performance. The current work investigated the effect of individual’s field dependence-independence and map’s frame of reference on user performance in orienting and navigating tasks using 2D electronic maps. The Experiments 1 indicated that field-dependent (FD) individuals showed significantly higher accuracy in orienting tasks when using the track-up maps than when using the north-up maps, whereas field-independent (FI) individuals had no difference when using either type of maps. The current study may imply that FD individuals showed worse performance than field-independent individuals when using north-up maps because an additional step of mental rotation was included when making direction judgments with north-up maps and FD individuals were more likely influenced by the external cues in mental rotations. Since track-up maps matched with the direction of travel, the mental rotation was not necessary, so that FD and FI individuals showed no significant difference in such direction judgment tasks. Experiment 2 examined the effects of field dependence and frame of reference on navigation task performance in the virtual environment. Results showed that FI individuals had better performance than FD individuals regarding the number of map references. The results also showed an interaction effect of field dependence and frame of reference on task completion time. In particular, FI individuals showed a significantly quicker time to complete the navigation task than FD individuals when using north-up maps, whereas they showed no difference in task completion time when using track-up maps. Although track-up maps led to the superior performance for FD individuals, the subjective rating of track-up maps was lower than that of north-up maps. In summary, previous empirical studies have failed to find clear evidence to support either North-up or Track-up designs. The current study proposed one possible implication of such inconsistent findings: that a user’s field dependence/ independence dimension in spatial cognition influences their performance when using different frames of reference. The mental rotation cost using a north-up display can be reduced for field-independent individuals since such users showed better performance in extracting and integrating information to maintain their mental representation of the system. This implication could be further utilized in the user-centered designs of navigation displays by considering individual differences.

The Role of the Field Dependence-independence Construct on the Flow-performance Link in Virtual Reality

Factors Affecting Chinese University Students’ Intention to Continue Using Virtual and Remote Labs

The effect of reducing distraction on the flow-performance link in virtual experiential learning environment

BALANCING FIDELITY AND PERFOR MANCE IN VIRTUAL WALKTHROUGH

The entity belief of concentration ability predicts cognitive load, failure-attribution, and flow experience when using a virtual reality device

The Impact of Different Virtual Work Environments on Flow, Performance, User Emotions, and Preferences

Influence of spatial presence and flow experience in a non-immersive virtual reality upper limb training system

Effects of Virtual-real Fusion on Immersion, Presence, and Learning Performance in Laboratory Education.

Enhancing VR Shopping with Dynamic Space Re-Arrangements: Towards Contextualized Information Displays and Improved Locomotion

Wayfinding Behavior and Spatial Knowledge Acquisition: Are They the Same in Virtual Reality and in Real-World Environments?

Manifest the Invisible: Design for Situational Awareness of Physical Environments in Virtual Reality

Individual Differences in Orienting and Navigating Tasks when Using North-Up and Track-Up Electronic Maps

The Effects of Immersion and Real-World Distractions on Virtual Social Interactions

A study on the correlation between seat selection and interaction preference in virtual-reality fusion simulation experiment

The impact of visual and auditory distractions on the performance of neurodiverse students in virtual reality (VR) environments

Examining the Effects of HMDs/FSDs and Gender Differences on Cognitive Processing Ability and User Experience of the Stroop Task-Embedded Virtual Reality Driving System (STEVRDS).

Using Virtual Reality as a Simulation Tool for Augmented Reality Virtual Windows: Effects on Cognitive Workload and Task Performance

Effect Of Illumination On Reading Performance And Affect In A Virtual Environment

Empirically Evaluating Virtual Reality’s Effect on Reservoir Engineering Tasks

FocusFlow: 3D Gaze-Depth Interaction in Virtual Reality Leveraging Active Visual Depth Manipulation

An Examination of the Effects of Virtual Reality Training on Spatial Visualization and Transfer of Learning