A web-based brain metastases segmentation and labeling platform for stereotactic radiosurgery

Zi Yang,Hui Liu,Yan Liu,Strahinja Stojadinovic,Robert Timmerman,Lucien Nedzi,Tu Dan,Zabi Wardak,Weiguo Lu,Xuejun Gu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/mp.14201
IF: 4.506
2020-01-01
Medical Physics
Abstract:Purpose Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) has become a standard of care for patients' with brain metastases (BMs). However, the manual multiple BMs delineation can be time-consuming and could create an efficiency bottleneck in SRS workflow. There is a clinical need for automatic delineation and quantitative evaluation tools. In this study, building on our previous developed deep learning-based segmentation algorithms, we developed a web-based automated BMs segmentation and labeling platform to assist the SRS clinical workflow. Method This platform was developed based on the Django framework, including a web client and a back-end server. The web client enables interactions as database access, data import, and image viewing. The server performs the segmentation and labeling tasks including: skull stripping; deep learning-based BMs segmentation; and affine registration-based BMs labeling. Additionally, the client can display BMs contours with corresponding atlas labels, and allows further postprocessing tasks including: (a) adjusting window levels; (b) displaying/hiding specific contours; (c) removing false-positive contours; (d) exporting contours as DICOM RTStruct files; etc. Results We evaluated this platform on 10 clinical cases with BMs number varied from 12-81 per case. The overall operation took about 4-5 min per patient. The segmentation accuracy was evaluated between the manual contour and automatic segmentation with several metrics. The averaged center of mass shift was 1.55 +/- 0.36 mm, the Hausdorff distance was 2.98 +/- 0.63 mm, the mean of surface-to-surface distance (SSD) was 1.06 +/- 0.31 mm, and the standard deviation of SSD was 0.80 +/- 0.16 mm. In addition, the initial averaged false-positive over union (FPoU) and false-negative rate (FNR) were 0.43 +/- 0.19 and 0.15 +/- 0.10 respectively. After case-specific postprocessing, the averaged FPoU and FNR were 0.19 +/- 0.10 and 0.15 +/- 0.10 respectively. Conclusion The evaluated web-based BMs segmentation and labeling platform can substantially improve the clinical efficiency compared to manual contouring. This platform can be a useful tool for assisting SRS treatment planning and treatment follow-up.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?