Single-cell Multiomic Analysis of in Vivo and in Vitro Matured Human Oocytes

Min Ye,Zhi-Yong Yang,Yu Zhang,Ya-Xin Xing,Qi-Gui Xie,Jian-Hong Zhou,Ling Wang,Wei Xie,KehKooi Kee,Ri-Cheng Chian
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/deaa044
IF: 6.1
2020-01-01
Human Reproduction
Abstract:STUDY QUESTION: Are there any differences between in vivo (IVV) and in vitro (IVT) matured metaphase II (MII) oocytes at the molecular level? SUMMARY ANSWER: Between IVV and IVT oocytes, 507 differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were identified; the non-CpG methylomes were significantly different, but the CpG methylomes and genomic copy number variations (CNVs) were similar. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: A previous study using microarray and single-cell RNA-seq analysis revealed that numerous genes were differentially expressed between IVV and IVT oocytes. Independent studies of DNA methylation profiling in human oocytes have revealed negative correlations between gene transcription and the DNA methylation level at gene promoter regions. No study has compared global CpG or non-CpG methylation between these two groups of oocytes. Although a high level of aneuploidy has been reported in MII oocytes, no direct comparison of IVV and IVT oocytes based on single-cell sequencing data has been performed. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: We collected eight IVV oocytes from six patients and seven IVT oocytes from seven patients and then analysed each oocyte using the previously established single-cell triple omics sequencing (scTrioseq) analysis to determine associations among the transcriptome, DNA methylome and chromosome ploidy in the oocytes. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: All IVV oocytes were donated by patients who received 150 IU gonadotropin per day from the third day of their menstrual cycle, followed by GnRH antagonist after 5 days of gonadotropin stimulation. All IVT oocytes were from immature oocytes which were donated by volunteers undergoing delivery by caesarean section then cultured in oocyte maturation medium containing 75 mIU/ml hMG for 24 to 48 h. Every single oocyte was analysed using the previously established single-cell multiomic sequencing analysis. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: There were 507 genes differentially expressed between the IVV (n=8) and IVT (n=7) oocytes, even though their global transcriptome profiles were similar. The enriched genes in IVV oocytes were related to the cell cycle process while those in IVT oocytes were related to mitochondrial respiration biogenesis. Although the global CpG methylation of the two groups of oocytes was similar, the non-CpG methylation level in IVV oocytes was higher than that in IVT oocytes. A high aneuploidy ratio was found in both groups, but the aneuploidy did not affect transcription according to the correlation analysis. LARGE-SCALE DATA: N/A. LIMITATIONS AND REASONS FOR CAUTION: Due to the difficulty in collecting MII oocytes, especially IVV matured oocytes, the sample size was limited. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: Our findings indicate that single-cell multiomic sequencing can be utilised to examine the similarity and differences between IVV and IVT matured MII oocytes.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?