Excitation-contraction Coupling in HFpEF Versus HFrEF: Role of Transverse-Axial Tubule System

Xin Yue,Peter Kilfoil,Rui Zhang,Stephan Aynaszyan,Yushun Zhang,Eduardo Marban,Joshua I. Goldhaber

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yjmcc.2019.11.109

2020-01-01

Abstract:A lack of mechanistic understanding has prevented development of effective treatment for heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) despite similar physical symptoms and mortality as heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). We compared excitation-contraction (EC) coupling and organization of the transverse-axial-tubule (TAT) system in phenotypically-verified rat models of HFrEF and HFpEF. We used Dahl Salt Sensitive (DS) rats with hypertension to model HFpEF, and chronic myocardial infarction in the parent rat strain (Sprague-Dawley) to model HFrEF. Echo/doppler was used to confirm reduced EF in the infarct model, and preserved EF with diastolic dysfunction (E/A and E/e’) in the hypertension model. To probe EC coupling, we employed patch clamp and simultaneous fluo-4 ultra-high-speed line scan (8000 lines/s) laser scanning confocal imaging. In HFrEF, L-type Ca current (ICa,L) and sarcoplasmic reticulum (SR) Ca stores were maintained, but Ca transient amplitude and spark recruitment were reduced. Furthermore, spark latency and dyssynchrony were increased, consistent with defective EC coupling. In contrast, ICa,L density increased by 23.7% @0 mV in HFpEF (p < .01) with increased SR Ca load, preserved Ca spark recruitment, shorter spark latency and reduced dyssynchrony. EC coupling machinery is concentrated within TATs, which can affect EC coupling. We assessed TATS by loading freshly isolated ventricular cardiomyocytes with Di-4-anepps. We used the x-y mode of the confocal to image membrane structure in the central focal plane (1024 × 1024 pixels, 0.1 μm/pixel) for each cell. Offline, we used the AutoTT program (Guo, A et al., Biophys J, 2014) to quantify TATs from representative areas of control, HFrEF and HFpEF cells (in a blinded fashion). Both T-tubule density and integrity were reduced by 35% in HFrEF, but remained well-organized (similar to control) in HFpEF. Axial tubule density and integrity were not significantly altered. We conclude that while loss of t-tubule integrity likely contributes to spark dyssynchrony and Ca transient depression in HFrEF, there is no obvious change in HFpEF TATs that would explain the enhanced EC coupling. The latter is more likely a function of increased ICa,L and attendant increase in SR Ca load.