Comparison Between Child-Pugh Score and Albumin-Bilirubin Grade in Patients Treated with the Combination Therapy of Transarterial Chemoembolization and Sorafenib for Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Zhexuan Wang,Qingling Fan,Mengmeng Wang,Enxin Wang,Huichen Li,Lei Liu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21037/atm.2020.02.114
IF: 3.616
2020-01-01
Annals of Translational Medicine
Abstract:Background Albumin-Bilirubin (ALBI) grade has been proposed for the evaluation of liver function in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). The combination therapy of transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) and sorafenib is widely used for HCC patients with preserved liver function; our study aimed to investigate and compare the discriminating values of ALBI grade and Child-Pugh score in overall survival (OS). Methods A total of 173 HCC patients with preserved liver function (Child-Pugh A) were enrolled. The prognostic values of OS for ALBI grade and Child-Pugh score were separately investigated. Results In multivariate analyses, both ALBI grade and Child-Pugh score could significantly stratify the patients with different OS [adjusted hazard ratio (HR) 2.15 and 1.48, P<0.001 and P=0.035 for ALBI grade and Child-Pugh score]. In addition, time-dependent ROC analysis demonstrated that the ALBI grade had a better discriminatory ability than Child-Pugh score in predicting survival, especially for long-term outcomes. According to the subgroup analyses, the ALBI grade remained significant in more patient subsets and was more consistent than Child-Pugh score for the prediction of OS. Conclusions ALBI grade was better than Child-Pugh score in stratifying prognosis for HCC patients with preserved liver function (Child-Pugh A) and treated by the combination therapy of TACE and sorafenib.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?