Enhancing the Feature Representation of Multi-Modal MRI Data by Combining Multi-View Information for MCI Classification

Jin Liu,Yi Pan,Fang-Xiang Wu,Jianxin Wang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neucom.2020.03.006
IF: 6
2020-01-01
Neurocomputing
Abstract:The classification of mild cognitive impairment (MCI), which is a early stage of Alzheimer’s disease and is associated with brain structural and functional changes, is still a challenging task. Recent studies have shown great promise for improving the performance of MCI classification by combining multiple structural and functional features, such as grey matter volume and clustering coefficient. However, extracting which features and how to combine multiple features to improve the performance of MCI classification have always been challenging problems. To address these problems, in this study we propose a new method to enhance the feature representation of multi-modal MRI data by combining multi-view information to improve the performance of MCI classification. Firstly, we extract two structural features (including grey matter volume and cortical thickness) and two functional features (including clustering coefficient and shortest path length) of each cortical brain region based on automated anatomical labeling (AAL) atlas from both T1w MRI and rs-fMRI data of each subject. Then, in order to obtain features that are more helpful in distinguishing MCI subjects, an improved multi-task feature selection method, namely MTFS-gLASSO-TTR, is proposed. Finally, a multi-kernel learning algorithm is adopted to combine multiple features to perform the MCI classification task. Our proposed MCI classification method is evaluated on 315 subjects (including 105 LMCI subjects, 105 EMCI subjects and 105 NCs) with both T1w MRI and rs-fMRI data from the Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) database. Experimental results show that our proposed method achieves an accuracy of 88.5% and an area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC) of 0.897 for LMCI/NC classification, an accuracy of 82.7% and an AUC of 0.832 for EMCI/NC classification, and an accuracy of 79.6% and an AUC of 0.803 for LMCI/EMCI classification, respectively. In addition, by comparison, the accuracy and AUC values of our proposed method are better than those of some existing state-of-the-art methods in MCI classification. Overall, our proposed MCI classification method is effective and promising for automatic diagnosis of MCI in clinical practice.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?