Plasma Microrna Signatures to Predict Egfr-Tki Resistance in Egfr-Mutant Advanced Nsclc Patients.

Shuhang Wang,Jie Wang,Hua Bai,Tongtong An,Jun Zhao,Zhijie Wang,Jianchun Duan,Minglei Zhuo,Yuyan Wang,Meina Wu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2013.31.15_suppl.e19136
IF: 45.3
2013-01-01
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Abstract:e19136 Background: EGFR mutation is a strong predictor of EGFR-TKIs (epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor) therapy in advanced NSCLC. However, 20-30% of patients with EGFR mutation are resistant to EGFR-TKIs, suggesting that other determinants of outcome beyond EGFR mutation might exist. We hypothesized that plasma microRNA (miRNA) might play a role. Methods: Training group: 20 advanced NSCLC patients treated with EGFR-TKIs as first-line therapy with EGFR 19 deletion mutation were enrolled, 10 of whom responded dramatically while other 10 are resistant. Matched plasma were collected for miRNA profile detection using TaqMan Low-Density (TLDA). Testing group: Real-time PCR were employed to identify the level of miRNAs found significant differently expressed in training step; bioinformatics was applied to find related miRNAs possibly account for resistance. Validation group: Another cohort with EGFR 19 deletion mutation present dramatically different response to EGFR-TKI was used to analyze the difference of miRNAs expression between responding and resistant group. Results: Training group: 153 miRNAs were found differently expressed between responding and resistant group. Testing group: 3 miRNAs (miR-21, AmiR-27a, and miR-218) were verified significantly higher (P=0.004, A0.009, A0.041, respectively) in resistant group than responding group. Validation group: expression level of these 3 miRNAs was validated to be significantly different (P=0.011, A0.011, A0.026, respectively) between 17 couples advanced NSCLC patients with different response to EGFR-TKI. Conclusions: Higher expression level of miR-21, AmiR-27a, and miR-218 might play the role in the resistance to EGFR-TKI for advanced NSCLC patients who had an EGFR exon 19 deletion mutation treated with EGFR-TKI, which needs further validation.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?