Abstract:BACKGROUND Research proves the effectiveness of psychological interventions in online settings. There is some evidence that people disclose more personal information online than in real life, however, the results appear inconsistent. OBJECTIVE The primary aim was to find out whether people in online counseling disclosed more than individuals receiving “face-to-face” counseling, whether there were differences between the two settings in regard to counseling outcome and whether people in online counseling disclosed more about the counseling to confidants. METHODS A survey was carried out in various counseling centers offering both online and “face-to-face” services. The Disclosure to Therapist Inventory-VI was used to assess the amount of self-disclosure in both settings. Clients’ attitudes towards revealing counseling aspects to other people in their lives were assessed using the Disclosure About Therapy Inventory. In total N= 80 respondents completed the survey, 31 participants received online counseling (38.8%), 49 people had “face-to-face“ counseling (61.3%). RESULTS Contradicting the hypothesis, the present study disproved the assumption that self-disclosure is higher in online counseling. Whereas both samples showed similar levels of disclosure on different counseling topics, clients in “face-to-face” situations revealed significantly more about two topics: self-actualization vs. adaptation (P= .010, d= 0.6) and self-doubt/shortcomings (P= .003, r= 0.33). Two treatment characteristics, namely counseling duration and motives affected the degree of disclosure. In regard to the counseling outcome participants were moderately satisfied in both groups. People in “face-to-face” counseling reported significantly better treatment outcome in regard to the increased capacity to relate well to others (P= .026, r= 0.25). The assumption that a higher level of self-disclosure is associated with better treatment outcomes was verified only for online counseling (P= .024, ß= .470). Clients in both settings disclosed moderately about aspects of their counseling to confidants with no significant differences between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS The present study could not prove the online disinhibition effect for the counseling setting. As the number of studies conducted on this topic is relatively small the present study calls for further research on larger samples. Thereby, incongruities on self-disclosure can be clarified, possibly leading to the revision of current theories or the development of new ones.

The Influence of Self-Disclosure in Online Support Seeking on Quality of Received Advice

What to Say when Seeking Support Online: A Comparison among Different Levels of Self-Disclosure.

What You Say Is What You Get: How Self-Disclosure in Support Seeking Affects Language Use in Support Provision in Online Support Forums

Cultural Variations in Reasons for Advice Seeking

How Social Context Cues in Online Support-Seeking Influence Self-Disclosure in Support Provision

Communicating Social Support Online: the Roles of Emotional Disclosures and Gender Cues in Support Provision.

What to Say to an Online Support-Seeker? the Influence of Others' Responses and Support-Seekers' Replies

They support, so we talk: the effects of other users on self-disclosure on social networking sites

Effects of Online Self-Disclosure on Social Feedback During the COVID-19 Pandemic

Online health community for change: Analysis of self-disclosure and social networks of users with depression

Is a Profile Worth a Thousand Words? How Online Support-Seeker’s Profile Features May Influence the Quality of Received Support Messages

When Should Advice Be Given? Assessing the Role of Sequential Placement of Advice in Supportive Interactions in Two Cultures

Understanding Advice in Supportive Interactions - Beyond the Facework and Message Evaluation Paradigm

Self-disclosure in Online versus “Face-to-Face” Counseling: A Survey among Clients (Preprint)

Comparing the Effects of Argumentation and Facework on Americans and Chinese' Responses to Advice in Supportive Interactions

Self‐efficacy, sympathy, and attributions: Understanding helping intentions towards disclosers of mental health concerns on social media

Investigating Patients' Adoption of Online Medical Advice

Examining Cultural Similarities and Differences in Responses to Advice

How Online Basic Psychological Need Satisfaction Influences Self-Disclosure Online among Chinese Adolescents: Moderated Mediation Effect of Exhibitionism and Narcissism

Perceived Costs versus Actual Benefits of Demographic Self-Disclosure in Online Support Groups