Abstract:Purpose Participation in global value chains (GVCs) is increasingly related to the economic growth of any country. The conceivable beneficial impact of GVCs on economic growth differs across countries and could be modified with the countries' domestic institutional arrangements. However, ignoring the complementarity between the components of institutional quality led to ignorance of the institutional imbalance present in the country. Hence, the primary purpose of this study is to examine the role of institutional imbalance as a moderating variable between GVC participation and economic growth from 2000 to 2018. Design/methodology/approach To address the issue of endogeneity among the variables in the model, the study employs the generalized methods of moments (GMM) as an econometric analysis method. Findings The study finds that well-functioning domestic institutions facilitate the positive impact of GVC participation on economic growth. Conversely, an increased institutional imbalance harms the relationship between GVC participation and economic growth. These findings emphasize a balanced portfolio of institutional components. It advocates the holistic development of each component to reap greater benefits for GVC participation for any country. The study highlights that the weakness in one of the components must be addressed rather than substituted by increasing the strength of another component. Research limitations/implications The policies should be framed to improve the weakest component first, followed by other components of institutional quality. Simultaneous reforms involving all the dimensions of institutional quality would smoothen the path of transforming GVCs trade to the country's economic development. Additionally, the high institutional imbalance can provide a bird's eye view to policymakers to work on specific aspects of institutional quality more rigorously. Originality/value The existing literature has used a combined measure of institutional quality as a mediator variable while measuring the impact of GVC participation on economic growth. While using a combined measure, it ignores the complementarity among its components. Assuming substitutability among various components may lead to an incorrect estimation. Using the arguments proposed by Bolen and Sobel (2020), the present study considers the existence of complementarity among various components of institutional quality. It calculates the institutional imbalance used as a moderating variable while estimating the impact of GVC participation on economic growth.

Institutions and Participation in Global Value Chains: Evidence from Belt and Road Initiative

Institutions and participation in global value chains

Trade Agreements and Global Value Chains: New Evidence from China’s Belt and Road Initiative

The impact of China's One-Belt One-Road initiative on international trade and global value chains

China trade with belt and road countries: the role and impact of institutions

Does the Belt and Road Initiative upgrade the global value chain for BRI Countries:Revealing the substantial role of infrastructure

“Going global” and FDI inflows in China: “One Belt & One Road” initiative as a quasi‐natural experiment

Spatial Correlation Effect of China's Outward Foreign Direct Investment in Countries along the One Belt and One Road

Institutional imbalance moderating the linkage between GVC participation and economic growth: empirical evidence

Bringing economic freedom back to the study of global value chains: empirical evidences from heterogeneous panel data approach

Greening the belt and road: How GVCs revolutionize carbon intensity in participating countries?

The roles of cultural and institutional distance in international trade: Evidence from China's trade with the Belt and Road countries

Global Value Chains Participation and Carbon Emissions: Evidence from Belt and Road Countries

Does “going Global” Help to Restrain Enterprises’ Financialization: the Belt and Road Initiative As a Quasi-Natural Experiment

Assessment of the Effects of Infrastructure Investment under the Belt and Road Initiative

Encirclement of productive capacities and institutions in context of sustainable development

Motivation behind China’s ‘One Belt, One Road’ Initiatives and Establishment of the Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank

Is participation in global value chains a blessing or a curse for green total factor productivity in Belt and Road initiative countries?

Does China's outward direct investment improve green total factor productivity in the "Belt and Road" countries? Evidence from dynamic threshold panel model analysis

Institutional Distance,Neighboring Effects and Bilateral Trade:An Empirical Analysis Based on Spatial Panel Model of “one Belt and One Road”Countries

Management of Green Economic Infrastructure and Environmental Sustainability in One Belt and Road Enitiative Economies