The impact of E<inf>mel</inf> range of dynamic lighting on alertness, fatigue and sleeping quality

Yu Liu,Ming Ronnier Luo,Peijung Wu,Binyu Teng
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/SSLChinaIFWS49075.2019.9019801
2019-01-01
Abstract:Our earlier works found dynamic lighting to have some positive effect on alertness and circadian response comparing with static light. This study further investigates different CCT ranges and melanopicilluminance (E <sub xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">mel</sub> ) or circadian stimulus (CS) of dynamic lightings. Sixteen subjects participated the experiment including 4 lightings, one each day from 20:30 to 23:00, and 4 days apart between each lighting. Four different lightings include two CCT ranges (from 6000K to 12000K and from 3000K to 9000K), each having a low and a high E <sub xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">mel</sub> level. Six testing methods were included task performance (the D2 test, go/no go), Critical Flicker Frequency (CFF), ocular fatigue questionnaire, sleepiness (Karolinska sleepiness scale), biochemical responses (melatonin and cortisol). The results showed that subjects were statistically significant more alert under high E <sub xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">mel</sub> lightings from the results of task performance, CFF, and both biochemical responses. As for the KSS and ocular-fatigue results, subjects felt sleepier and less fatigue under both low E <sub xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">mel</sub> and low CCT range lightings. The strong duration effect was revealed from the results of KSS, ocular fatigue and biochemical responses.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?