Comparative Effectiveness of Team-Based Care with and Without a Clinical Decision Support System for Diabetes Management
Xiulin Shi,Jiang He,Mingzhu Lin,Changqin Liu,Bing Yan,Haiqu Song,Caihong Wang,Fangsen Xiao,Peiying Huang,Liying Wang,Zhibin Li,Yinxiang Huang,Mulin Zhang,Chung-Shiuan Chen,Katherine Obst,Lizheng Shi,Weihua Li,Shuyu Yang,Guanhua Yao,Xuejun Li
DOI: https://doi.org/10.7326/m22-1950
IF: 39.2
2023-01-01
Annals of Internal Medicine
Abstract:BACKGROUNDUncontrolled hyperglycemia, hypercholesterolemia, and hypertension are common in persons with diabetes.OBJECTIVETo compare the effectiveness of team-based care with and without a clinical decision support system (CDSS) in controlling glycemia, lipids, and blood pressure (BP) among patients with type 2 diabetes.DESIGNCluster randomized trial. (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02835287).SETTING38 community health centers in Xiamen, China.PATIENTS11 132 persons aged 50 years or older with uncontrolled diabetes and comorbid conditions, 5475 receiving team-based care with a CDSS and 5657 receiving team-based care alone.INTERVENTIONTeam-based care was delivered by primary care physicians, health coaches, and diabetes specialists in all centers. In addition, a computerized CDSS, which generated individualized treatment recommendations based on clinical guidelines, was implemented in 19 centers delivering team-based care with a CDSS.MEASUREMENTSCoprimary outcomes were mean reductions in hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) level, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) level, and systolic BP over 18 months and the proportion of participants with all 3 risk factors controlled at 18 months.RESULTSDuring the 18-month intervention, HbA1c levels, LDL-C levels, and systolic BP significantly decreased by -0.9 percentage point (95% CI, -0.9 to -0.8 percentage point), -0.49 mmol/L (CI, -0.53 to -0.45 mmol/L) (-19.0 mg/dL [CI, -20.4 to -17.5 mg/dL]), and -9.1 mm Hg (CI, -9.9 to -8.3 mm Hg), respectively, in team-based care with a CDSS and by -0.6 percentage point (CI, -0.7 to -0.5 percentage point), -0.32 mmol/L (CI, -0.35 to -0.29 mmol/L) (-12.5 mg/dL [CI, -13.6 to -11.3 mg/dL]), and -7.5 mm Hg (CI, -8.4 to -6.6 mm Hg), respectively, in team-based care alone. Net differences were -0.2 percentage point (CI, -0.3 to -0.1 percentage point) for HbA1c level, -0.17 mmol/L (CI, -0.21 to -0.12 mmol/L) (-6.5 mg/dL [CI, -8.3 to -4.6 mg/dL]) for LDL-C level, and -1.5 mm Hg (CI, -2.8 to -0.3 mm Hg) for systolic BP. The proportion of patients with controlled HbA1c, LDL-C, and systolic BP was 16.9% (CI, 15.7% to 18.2%) in team-based care with a CDSS and 13.0% (CI, 11.7% to 14.3%) in team-based care alone.LIMITATIONThere was no usual care control, and clinical outcome assessors were unblinded; the analysis did not account for multiple comparisons.CONCLUSIONCompared with team-based care alone, team-based care with a CDSS significantly reduced cardiovascular risk factors in patients with diabetes, but the effect was modest.PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCEXiamen Municipal Health Commission.