Productivity Versus Citation Impact: A Study of Persons, Not Just Authors.

Lin Zhang,Gunnar Sivertsen

2017-01-01

Abstract:In two independent studies that were first presented at ISSI 2015 and recently published in PLOS ONE, Lariviere & Costas (2016) and Sandstrom & van den Besselaar (2016) observe similarly that productivity among individual researchers is correlated with citation impact in large datasets from Web of Science (WoS). While the latter study draws the policy implication that productivity should be incentivized, the first study explains their finding by the Mertonian theory of cumulative advantages and maintains that research assessment should be qualitative and focus on research quality. Both studies are based on author name disambiguation and Web of Science data. As acknowledged by the authors, there are several problems with studying individual productivity by using author name disambiguation. In our study of the same general research question, we instead match Web of Science with national datasets that have information about the persons behind the author names. We know their age, gender, position and affiliation, as well as their former career and educational background in the higher education sector. We also have bibliographic information about all their peer reviewed scholarly and scientific publications - not only those covered by Web of Science. Our aim is to get deeper insight into the conditions that influence observable productivity differences among authors in Web of Science, and thereby to establish a firmer basis, both for understanding the correlations found in the former studies, and for expressing the implications for research policy.