Central and peripheral modulation of gastrointestinal transit in mice by DN-9, a multifunctional opioid/NPFF receptor agonist.

Biao Xu,Yuanyuan Guo,Mengna Zhang,Run Zhang,Dan Chen,Qinqin Zhang,Jian Xiao,Kangtai Xu,Ning Li,Yu Qiu,Hanwen Zhu,Jiandong Niu,Xiaoyu Zhang,Quan Fang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/nmo.13848
2020-01-01
Abstract:Background The nonapeptide DN-9 functions as a multifunctional agonist to opioid and neuropeptide FF (NPFF) receptors and exhibits antinociceptive effects at the central and peripheral levels. Methods The effects of DN-9 on small and colonic intestinal transit were evaluated using the upper gastrointestinal (GI) transit test and colonic bead expulsion assay, respectively. Opioid and NPFF receptor antagonists were used to investigate the mechanisms of DN-9-induced GI inhibition. Furthermore, the agonism of the DN-9 analog [Phg(9)]-DN-9 to opioid and NPFF receptors was tested by the cAMP assay. Key results Intracerebroventricular administration of DN-9 dose-dependently slowed upper GI transit and colonic expulsion via mu- and kappa-opioid receptors in the brain, independent of the delta-opioid receptor. Similarly, intraperitoneal injection of DN-9 dose-dependently inhibited GI propulsion via the peripheral opioid receptors. DN-9-induced GI transit inhibitions were significantly aggravated by the NPFF receptor antagonist RF9. Moreover, the DN-9 analog [Phg(9)]-DN-9, an agonist at mu-, delta-, and kappa-opioid receptors but not NPFF receptors, inhibited GI more potently than DN-9. In addition, intracerebroventricular NPFF significantly attenuated the central inhibitory effects induced by [Phg(9)]-DN-9 and morphine. However, central and peripheral injections of NPFF or RF9 almost had no significant effects on GI transit by itself. Conclusion and Inferences Intracerebroventricular and intraperitoneal administrations of DN-9 inhibit GI transit via opioid receptors in mice by central and peripheral mechanisms, respectively. In addition, the NPFF agonism of DN-9 possesses antiopioid effects on GI transit, which might explain the reduced constipation at the antinociceptive doses.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?