Abstract:Purpose: To compare the outcomes of implants inserted in maxillary sinuses augmented with 100% anorganic bovine bone (ABB) grafts versus mixed with 50% ABB and 50% autologous bone graft using a lateral window approach. Materials and methods: This study was designed as a randomised controlled trial of parallel groups. Patients in need of an implant-supported prosthesis in maxillary posterior areas, with a residual alveolar bone height ranging between 0 and 4 mm, were recruited for lateral sinus grafting and implant placement. Patients were randomly allocated to receive two different graft materials according to a parallel group design: group A was grafted with 50% ABB and 50% autogenous bone; group B was grafted with 100% ABB. After 7 months, tapered implants were inserted with an insertion torque between 20 and 45 Ncm. Three months later implants were loaded with screw-retained temporary crowns. Definitive crowns were delivered after 3 months. Outcome measures were implant and prosthesis survival rates, complications, radiographic marginal bone-level changes, probing pocket depths (PPDs) and bleeding on probing (BOP). Clinical data were collected at definitive prosthesis delivery, and 1, 2 and 5 years after definitive loading. Results: Thirty-two consecutive patients were treated with 32 sinus elevation procedures (16 group A, 16 group B). A total of 46 implants were inserted. One patient (with two implants) dropped out in group A, and two patients (with three implants) dropped out in group B. No implant/crown failed by the end of the study. Three complications (one sinus membrane perforation and two chipping of the ceramic) were observed in three patients in group A, versus none in group B (relative risk was 0.81; 95% CI 0.64-1.03; P = 0.225). At the 2-year follow-up, the mean marginal bone loss was 1.18 ± 0.50 mm (95% CI 0.95-1.45 mm) in group A and 1.28 ± 0.48 mm (95% CI 0.97-1.43 mm) in group B, with no statistically significant differences between the two groups (difference 0.11 ± 0.22 mm; 95% CI -0.06-0.16 mm; P = 0.586). At the 5-year follow-up, the mean marginal bone loss was 1.37 ± 0.48 mm (95% CI 1.13-1.86 mm) in group A and 1.42 ± 0.48 mm (95% CI 1.17-1.90 mm) in group B (difference 0.15 ± 0.08 mm; 95% CI 0.10-0.22 mm; P = 0.426). At the 2-year follow-up, the mean PPD value was 2.70 ± 0.39 mm for group A and 2.54 ± 0.66 mm for group B, with no statistically significant difference between groups (difference 0.17 ± 0.39 mm; 95% CI 0.06-0.32 mm; P = 0.456). At the 5-year follow-up, the mean PPD value was 3.20 ± 0.44 mm for group A and 3.32 ± 0.49 mm for group B (difference 0.12 ± 0.43 mm; 95% CI 0.02-0.22 mm; P = 0.672). At the 2-year follow-up, the mean BOP value was 1.21 ± 0.79 for group A and 1.28 ± 0.68 for group B (difference 0.06 ± 0.49; 95% CI -0.23-0.25; P = 0.297), and at the 5-year follow-up, the mean BOP value was 1.77 ± 0.62 for group A and 1.91 ± 0.48 for group B (difference: 0.14 ± 0.51; 95% CI -0.05-0.33; P = 0.492). Conclusions: Within the limitations of this study, the present data confirm similar clinical outcomes of implants inserted in sinuses grafted with ABB versus implants inserted in sinuses grafted with mixed 50% ABB and 50% autologous bone.

Staged horizontal bone augmentation for dental implants in aesthetic zones: A prospective randomized controlled clinical trial comparing a half-columnar bone block harvested from the ramus versus a rectangular bone block from the symphysis.

Radiographic Evaluation of the Tenting Screw Technique in Horizontal Alveolar Bone Augmentation: A Retrospective Study

The influence of bone block graft position on bone dimensional changes in staged onlay horizontal ridge augmentation: A 6‐month retrospective cohort study

[Clinical Effects of Ridge Augmentation with the Half-Columnar Shaped Mandibular Bone Block for the Placement of Dental Implants].

Fully Digital Versus Conventional Workflow for Horizontal Ridge Augmentation with Intraoral Block Bone: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial.

"Xenogeneic Bone Block in Lateral Ridge Augmentation: Where Are We Now?' A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Horizontal Alveolar Ridge Augmentation with Allogeneic Bone Block Graft Compared with Autogenous Bone Block Graft: a Systematic Review

Retrospective Radiological and Clinical Study

Linear and Volumetric Augmentation in Anterior Maxilla Using Autogenous Symphysis Bone Graft

Horizontal ridge augmentation in the maxillary aesthetic region using the autogenous circular cortical‐lamina anchoring technique: A case series study

Horizontal Alveolar Ridge Augmentation with Xenogenic Block Grafts Compared with Autogenous Bone Block Grafts for Implant-retained Rehabilitation: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Sinus lift grafting with anorganic bovine bone vs 50% autologous bone mixed with 50% anorganic bovine bone: 2 years after loading results from a randomised controlled trial

Sinus augmentation grafting with anorganic bovine bone versus 50% autologous bone mixed with 50% anorganic bovine bone: 5 years after loading results from a randomised controlled trial

Bilamina Cortical Tenting Grafting Technique for Three-Dimensional Reconstruction of Severely Atrophic Alveolar Ridges in Anterior Maxillae: A 6-Year Prospective Study.

Horizontal Bone Augmentation in the Anterior Esthetic Area of the Maxilla Using a Flap Design Adapted from Mucogingival Surgery in Association with PLA Membrane and β-TCP

Clinical outcomes following a combined vertical and horizontal alveolar ridge augmentation and two‐stage implant placement using either autogenous tooth roots or autogenous bone blocks

Radiographic graft changes following maxillary sinus floor augmentation with autogenous bone compared with composite grafts: a one-year single-blind randomized controlled trial

Guided Bone Regeneration with Concentrated Growth Factor Enriched Bone Graft Matrix (Sticky Bone) vs. Bone-Shell Technique in Horizontal Ridge Augmentation: A Retrospective Study

Maxillary Alveolar Ridge Expansion with Split-Crest Technique Compared with Lateral Ridge Augmentation with Autogenous Bone Block Graft: a Systematic Review

Comparative Assessment of Bovine Versus Porcine Xenograft for Augmentation: A Randomized Prospective Cohort Study

Onlay grafting with bovine bone mineral block for horizontal reconstruction of severely atrophic alveolar ridges in anterior maxillae: A 6-year prospective study.