Abstract:Introduction In the diagnostic workup of erectile dysfunction (ED) the Nocturnal Penile Tumescence and Rigidity test (NPTR) is being used less and less because of its inconvenience but also in part because of the intrinsic limits of this test. In particular, the NPTR has been considered very useful to diagnose psychogenic ED when it is positive (normal) but less informative when it is negative (pathological) because of the high incidence of false negatives. Other tests have been suggested to better diagnose an organic ED, especially the dynamic Penile Colour-Doppler Ultrasound (PCDU) to study the penile vascular response and detect a vasculogenic ED. Objective The purpose of the study was to explore the value of a pathological NPTR by investigating relationship between the NPTR result and the peripheral vascular health at the carotid, brachial and cavernous arteries. Methods We conducted an observational study involving patients with ED who had undergone a NPTR as part of their ED diagnostic workup. We assessed their peripheral vascular health through (1) the measurement of the intima-media thickness at the carotid arteries (cIMT), (2) the measurement of the flow-mediated dilation at the brachial artery (FMD), and (3) performing a PCDU. Results Globally, our patients presented with a normal cIMT, FMD and Peak Systolic Value (PSV) in the PCDU. The group with pathological NPTR were significantly older than patients with normal NPTR (55.6 vs 44.1 years, p=0.002), had a higher prevalence of hypertension (50.0 vs 6.8%, p=0.001), longer hypertension duration (8.0 vs 1.3 years, p=0.035), a higher prevalence of diabetes mellitus (42.9 vs 6.8%, p= 0.004), higher blood glucose (111 vs 92 mg/dl, p=0.004) and higher blood triglycerides levels (188 vs 96 mg/dl, p=0.002). Furthermore, they showed lower PSV (46.2 vs 71.0 cm/s, p=0.002) while we did not find significant differences as regards cIMT and FMD between the two groups. Interestingly, the prevalence of patients with pathological PSV (<35 cm/s) was higher among patients with a pathological NPTR but without reaching the statistical significance. However, when adopted an age-dependant cut-off described in the literature (PSV < age x 0.7 + 6.73) the difference between the two groups became significant (50.0 vs 11.4%, p=0.005). Finally, the correlation analysis showed a significant correlation between PSV and the cIMT (-0.352, ρ=0.009), the maximum number of events in the RPTR record (+0.344, ρ=0.012), and the mean tip tumescence (+0.303, ρ=0.036). When corrected for age, these associations lost their statistical significance. Conclusions This study demonstrates the diagnostic value of a pathological NPTR which suggests an organic aetiology of the ED and associates with pathological findings in the PCDU. Age appears to be one of the most important risk factors for ED, even when other risk factors are present. Finally, when using a PCDU to diagnose vasculogenic ED, a cut-off of 35 cm/s might be less sensitive than an age-dependent cut-off to detect early impairments of penile endothelial function. Disclosure No.

Application of Nocturnal Penile Tumescence Test in the Diagnosis of Erectile Dysfunction

AB162. is It Feasible to Apply a New Concept of Erectile Dysfunction Syndrome (EDS) in Clinical Practice

[Real-Time Rigiscan Monitoring and Color Doppler Ultrasonography in the Diagnosis of Erectile Dysfunction].

Clinical Application of the Nocturnal Penile Tumescence Test of Electrobioimpedance Volumetric Assessment

AB029. The clinical significance of RigiScan plus detection

AB132. Nocturnal Penile Tumescence Monitoring: What Have We Done and What Should We Do?

Study on Nocturnal Penile Tumescene of 8 ED Patients

The Role of Nocturnal Penile Tumescence and Rigidity (NPTR) Monitoring in the Diagnosis of Psychogenic Erectile Dysfunction: A Review

Corpus Cavernosum Electromyography, A Usable Clinical Diagnostic Method for Erectile Dysfunction?

Role of RigiScan parameters in differentiation of vascular erectile dysfunction

Association between testosterone levels and RigiScan parameters of patients with erectile dysfunction

632 Consecutive Nightly Recordings Are Required for the Accurate Monitoring of Nocturnal Erections

[Pde-5I Combined with RigiScan-based Audiovisual Sexual Stimulation Test Versus Nocturnal Penile Tumescence Test in Evaluation of Erectile Function].

Nocturnal Penile Tumescence and the Effect of Tadalafil on Erectile Dysfunction

Correlation between nocturnal penile tumescence and vascular endothelial function

(141) Can a Nocturnal Penile Tumescence and Rigidity Test Detect Organic Aetiology of Erectile Dysfunction? A Peripheral and Penile Vascular Study

Initial study on the usage of rigiscan through the provocative mode and nocturnal mode (report of 36 cases)

477 The value of monitoring nocturnal penile tumescence and rigidity testing (NPTR) for three consecutive nights in the forensic identification.

A comprehensive review of monitoring methods for erectile dysfunction diagnosis

Erection Hardness Score in Masturbation Can Serve as a Preliminary Screening Tool for Organic Erectile Dysfunction

A Study of the Relationship Between Objective Tests to Diagnose Erectile Dysfunction and Markers of Cardiovascular Disease