Abstract:Journal of Nursing ManagementVolume 29, Issue 3 p. 357-359 EDITORIALFree Access Strengthening the power of nurses in combating COVID-19 Yuxia Zhang RN, PhD, FAAN, Corresponding Author Yuxia Zhang RN, PhD, FAAN Director [email protected] orcid.org/0000-0003-4419-7004 Department of Nursing, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China Correspondence Yuxia Zhang, No. 180 Fenglin Road, Shanghai 200032, China. Email: [email protected]Search for more papers by this author Yuxia Zhang RN, PhD, FAAN, Corresponding Author Yuxia Zhang RN, PhD, FAAN Director [email protected] orcid.org/0000-0003-4419-7004 Department of Nursing, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China Correspondence Yuxia Zhang, No. 180 Fenglin Road, Shanghai 200032, China. Email: [email protected]Search for more papers by this author First published: 07 April 2020 https://doi.org/10.1111/jonm.13023Citations: 18AboutSectionsPDF ToolsRequest permissionExport citationAdd to favoritesTrack citation ShareShare Give accessShare full text accessShare full-text accessPlease review our Terms and Conditions of Use and check box below to share full-text version of article.I have read and accept the Wiley Online Library Terms and Conditions of UseShareable LinkUse the link below to share a full-text version of this article with your friends and colleagues. Learn more.Copy URL In December 2019, several novel coronavirus infections were firstly reported in Wuhan, Hubei Province in China, and the outbreak is quickly expanding locally and globally. World Health Organization (World Health Organization, 2020b) announced the coronavirus epidemic as an 'International Public Health Emergency of International Concern (PHEIC)' on 30 January 2020. Later officially named as coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), it has been recognized by WHO (World Health Organization, 2020c) as a global pandemic on 11 March 2020. As of March 27, there have been more than 82,000 confirmed cases in China and more than 520,000 outside China. Hospitals serve as the outpost and main battlefield for prevention and control of emerging infectious diseases (EID) like COVID-19. Since the very beginning of the outbreak, nurses in China have been playing a vital role in combating the pandemic. Echoing calls for mobilization from National Health Commission of China, up to 1 March 2020, totally 28.6 thousand nurses were deployed to support Hubei Province, accounting for 68% of all frontline medical workforce (China, 2020). Meanwhile, we should also realize that nurses in hospitals outside the centre of the outbreak make great contributions to epidemic control. As the sentinel hospital, Zhongshan Hospital affiliated to Fudan University is a 2000-bed tertiary general hospital located in Shanghai, with more than 2000 practising nurses. Our nursing team has made great efforts during the outbreak and achieved remarkable effects. Since January 2020, a total of 4,675 patients visited fever clinic in our hospital, and 53 suspected cases of COVID-19 were monitored, of which three were confirmed and transferred to Shanghai Public Health Medical Centre for further standard treatments of COVID-19. With effective countermeasures against the outbreak, usual health care services have been gradually restored. Patient safety was assured in our hospital with no nosocomial infection. It is a challenge for hospitals to balance the routine work and outbreak control. As the director of nursing department, I would like to share our experience in combating COVID-19. 1 WHAT WE HAVE DONE? Frontline fighters to support outbreak areas As one of first-tier medical centres in China, the first task during the COVID-19 outbreak was to select and reallocate capable nurses to support outbreak areas: Wuhan, Hubei Province. In compliance with urgent deployment from the National Health Commission, our hospital was requested to assign three teams with 102 nurses in total to support the hospitals in Wuhan. Our nursing department conducted a review of existing staff capacity in each department to build up a COVID-19 Rapid Response Team (C-RRT). The criteria for nurses recruited into the C-RRT were as follows: (a) more than three-year work experience; (b) work capabilities in emergency, critical care, respiratory and infection departments; and (c) based on a voluntary principle. The selected nurses were listed in a staff roster, which was dispatched and assigned by the COVID-19 hospital committee directly. During their practice in Wuhan, they are tasked with making real-time difficult decisions in rapidly evolving, uncertain circumstances. Full-scale support is essential to our nurses. Our hospital in Shanghai not only provided adequate medical supplies to ensure their work under full protection, but also timely monitored their mental well-being and initiated psychological support by Balint group consultant if needed (Abeni et al., 2014). The above supportive strategies ensured our frontline nurses practise in best conditions, and empowered them to provide the best health care services to COVID-19 patients. Gatekeepers to screen suspected patients As the sentinel hospital, nurses are the first line to screen suspected patients in outpatient and emergency departments. Well-trained nurses were allocated to these departments. For the convenience of management, we decreased the number of hospital entrances and implemented one-way exit. At the entrances, all patients and visitors were required to take temperature check and epidemiological interview. In order to decrease cross-infection, two fever clinics were set up to separate patients with and without an epidemiological history. Patients with symptoms of fever or cough and an epidemiological history in epidemic area were sent to the first fever clinic accompanied by nurses to receive CT examination and laboratory tests. For patients only having fever or cough but without an epidemiological history, they were sent to the second fever clinic for corresponding treatment. If patients showed unstable vital signs without an epidemiological history, they were sent to the emergency rooms for urgent treatment. Supervisors to prevent intra-hospital infection Led by head nurses in each department, nurses contributed to supervising the compliance of protection measures. A temporary isolation room was set up in each ward and ICU in order to timely isolate suspected patients. Additionally, private interview room equipped with protective supplies was established for doctors and patients' families to communicate. Because the outbreak occurred during Spring Festival holidays, medical staff and workers travelled back from their hometowns or vacations also increased the risks of coronavirus spreading in hospital. Thus, medical staff and workers in our hospital who recently returned to Shanghai must self-quarantine at home for two weeks, and temperature must be reported once per day. Those who have temperatures above 37.3°C have to go to fever clinics for further examination. Practitioners to ensure clinical safety During the COVID-19 outbreak, nurses not only ensured the quality of patient care, but also prevented infection outbreak in the hospital. We classified the different clinical procedures into three risk levels according to the degree of exposure; thus, we were able to allocate protective materials reasonably. Hand hygiene and medical protection were strengthened in daily practice (Di Muzio, Cammilletti, Petrelli, & Di Simone, 2015). Patients who need intra-hospital transportation were protected by wearing surgical masks. We upgraded the protective level for newly admitted patients with fever during the outbreak considering the incubation period. For example, medical staff should wear protective clothes and goggles for procedures like intubation for critical patients, and closed suction system was applied. To avoid people gathering, we established new visiting policies with strict visiting time (10:00–12:00 hr and 14:00–16:00 hr), and only one visitor was allowed for each patient. Educators and companions for patients and families Nurses were uniquely positioned to educate patients and the public, dispel rumours and misconceptions, and provide valuable, trusted resources. During the outbreak, information sheet was delivered to the public, including self-protection, hand hygiene and avoiding gathering. Moreover, precautions for hospital visiting were explained by nurses, including keeping social distance, wearing mask correctly and cough etiquette. To reduce waiting time, outpatient appointment and online medical consultation were initiated. Due to traffic control and home isolation, some patients' families could not visit and accompany patients; thus, nurses became important companions to reduce anxiety and loneliness for in-hospital patients. Nurses also assisted to provide the daily necessities for patients in need. 2 WHAT WE HAVE LEARNT? It is imperative to recognize that nurses are our most valuable resources in fighting this pandemic. We conclude that a preparatory framework must be established that can be initiated anytime to ensure hospital running in an orderly manner. At the beginning of the outbreak, coordination with different departments is critical to ensure efficient and seamless functioning of the system. Our nursing department rapidly reallocates the nursing resources after full assessment and ensures adequate number of nurses in key areas including fever clinics, emergency department and ICUs. The training for nurses is also necessary to improve their preparedness in epidemiology, infection control, donning and doffing of protective equipment. Nurses must remain vigilant and maintain a high level of awareness during epidemics. Our frontline nurses contributed greatly in screening suspected patients and cutting off the source of nosocomial infection. Furthermore, nurses were exclusively important to provide health education and improve patient adherence, while reducing anxiety during the outbreak. In addition to professional knowledge and skills, nurses should show love, empathy and compassion to relieve patients' physical and psychological pain. 3 CONCLUSION 2020 celebrates the bicentenary of Florence Nightingale's birth and is designated by World Health Organization as the first ever Year of the Nurse and Midwife (World Health Organization, 2020a). In this unprecedented outbreak, the nursing department in our hospital demonstrated great power to sustain normal running of the hospital and showed effectiveness in preventing hospital infection. There is no one-size-fits-all set of management model across all settings, but core elements of our successful response would be beneficial, which consists of strong leadership, effective precaution mechanism, standard preventing and controlling protocols, ability for in-time execution and adequate supervision. We hope sharing our management and practice experience with other institutions to enhance their preparedness for the outbreak and promote professional performance in battle against COVID-19. REFERENCES Abeni, M. S., Magni, M., Conte, M., Mangiacavalli, S., Pochintesta, L., Vicenzi, G., … Corso, A. (2014). Psychological care of caregivers, nurses and physicians: A study of a new approach. Cancer Medicine, 3(1), 101– 110. https://doi.org/10.1002/cam4.163 Di Muzio, M., Cammilletti, V., Petrelli, E., & Di Simone, E. (2015). Hand hygiene in preventing nosocomial infections: A nursing research. Annali Di Igiene, 27(2), 485– 491. https://doi.org/10.7416/ai.2015.2035 Government of Hubei Province, China (2020). 28,600 nurses supporting Hubei Province played an important role in treatment. Retrieved from http://www.hubei.gov.cn/zhuanti/2020/gzxxgzbd/qfqk/202003/t20200301_2164990.shtml World Health Organization (2020a). Year of the Nurse and the Midwife 2020. Retrieved from https://www.who.int/news-room/campaigns/year-of-the-nurse-and-the-midwife-2020 World Health Organization. (2020b). Emergency Committee. In Statement on the second meeting of the International Health Regulations (2005) Emergency Committee regarding the outbreak of novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV). Retrieved from https://www.who.int/news-room/detail/23-01-2020-statement-on-the-meeting-of-the-international-health-regulations-(2005)-emergency-committee-regarding-the-outbreak-of-novel-coronavirus-(2019-ncov) World Health Organization. (2020c, 11 March 2020). WHO Director-General's opening remarks at the media briefing on COVID-19 – 11 March 2020. Retrieved from https://www.who.int/dg/speeches/detail/who-director-general-s-opening-remarks-at-the-media-briefing-on-covid-19–-11-march-2020 Citing Literature Volume29, Issue3April 2021Pages 357-359 ReferencesRelatedInformation

Abstract:The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outbreak in Wuhan, China, has caused considerable infection in health-care workers (HCWs). More than 3,000 cases in 422 involved medical facilities have been reported by the Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention (China CDC) as of February 22, 2020; 64% occurred in Wuhan.1Epidemiology Working Group for NCIP Epidemic Response, Chinese Center for Disease Control and PreventionThe epidemiological characteristics of an outbreak of 2019 novel coronavirus diseases (COVID-19) in China.Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi. 2020; 41 ([in Chinese]): 145-151PubMed Google Scholar However, the incidence and patterns of infection in medical staff have not yet been described. COVID-19 infection rates, models of infection, and clinical characteristics and outcomes among HCWs were examined in Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, a general hospital with 5,200 beds, 118 clinical departments, 33 administrative divisions, and 6,507 staff members. This study enrolled 166 medical staff members diagnosed with COVID-19 from January 10, 2020, to February 11, 2020. The data cutoff date was February 19, 2020. Nucleic acid testing for COVID-19 is mandatory for all symptomatic staff members, suspected case subjects, and close contacts of COVID-19 patients, and optional for any other staff members. Diagnostic criteria for COVID-19 were based on the Diagnosis and Treatment Scheme of Novel Coronavirus-Infected Pneumonia, Version 6, by the China CDC.2National Health Commission of the PRCDiagnosis and Treatment Scheme of Novel Coronavirus–Infected Pneumonia, Version 6.http://www.nhc.gov.cn/xcs/zhengcwj/202003/4856d5b0458141fa9f376853224d41d7.shtmlGoogle Scholar This retrospective study was approved by the institutional ethics board of Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University (No. 2020020). Clinical characteristics and distribution of the study subjects were recorded. Red area was defined as where those diagnosed or suspected cases were isolated or treated. The study subjects were divided into three groups: a mild group, with asymptomatic or mild symptoms but no radiographic evidence of pneumonia; a moderate group, with moderate symptoms such as a fever or respiratory symptoms, or with radiographic evidence of pneumonia; and a severe group, with respiratory distress (respiratory rate ≥ 30 times per minute), hypoxemia (blood oxygen saturation ≤ 93% at rest), or Pao2/Fio2 ≤ 300 mm Hg. All patients were managed with standard treatment protocols of antivirotics and antiinflammatory drugs,3Zhang JJ, Dong X, Cao YY, et al. Clinical characteristics of 140 patients infected by SARS-CoV-2 in Wuhan, China [published online ahead of print February 19, 2020]. Allergy. https://doi.org/10.1111/all.14238.Google Scholar, 4Huang C. Wang Y. Li X. et al.Clinical features of patients infected with 2019 novel coronavirus in Wuhan, China.Lancet. 2020; 395: 497-506Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (32455) Google Scholar, 5Wu F. Zhao S. Yu B. et al.A new coronavirus associated with human respiratory disease in China.Nature. 2020; 579 ([published correction appears in Nature. 2020;580(7803):E7]): 265-269Crossref PubMed Scopus (7481) Google Scholar symptomatic and respiratory support, and assessment of demographic, clinical, radiologic, and laboratory characteristics. The total CT score was the sum of lung involvement (5 lobes, score 1-5 for each lobe, range, 0 none, 25 maximum). The CT score was recorded according to previously reported methods.6Pan F. Ye T. Sun P. et al.Time course of lung changes on chest CT during recovery from 2019 novel coronavirus (COVID-19) pneumonia.Radiology. 2020; 295 (fro): 715Crossref PubMed Scopus (1847) Google Scholar,7Chang Y.C. Yu C.J. Chang S.C. et al.Pulmonary sequelae in convalescent patients after severe acute respiratory syndrome: evaluation with thin-section CT.Radiology. 2005; 236: 1067-1075Crossref PubMed Scopus (236) Google Scholar The incidence curve of COVID-19 patients and infected HCWs is shown in Figure 1. Among 6,507 HCWs (median age, 33.0 years [interquartile range, 28.0-42.0 years]; 1,920 male subjects, 4,587 female subjects), the infection rate was 2.55% (n = 166; median age, 34.0 years [interquartile range, 21.0-57.0 years]; 50 male subjects, 116 female subjects). Staff members with both clinical (140 cases [46 in the red area, 94 outside the red area]; 84.3%) and nonclinical (26 cases; 15.7%) cases were involved. No epidemic chain of transmission of COVID-19 originated from one super spreader. Table 1 includes the clinical characteristics for patients. Most cases were classified into the mild (9.64%) or moderate (80.12%) group. As of the study cutoff date, 69 patients (including eight mild, 54 moderate, and seven severe cases) were discharged (median length of stay, 16.7 days). The 97 remaining hospitalized cases recovered significantly. As of March 25, 2020, all moderate or mild cases and two severe cases had been discharged. The other eight with severe disease were discharged on April 17, 2020, and no one died (data not shown).Table 1Baseline Characteristics of Hospital Staff Infected With COVID-19VariableTotal (N = 166)Mild Cases (n = 16)Moderate Cases (n = 133)Severe Cases (n = 17)PCharacteristic Age, median (range), y34 (21-57)29 (24-42)35 (21-58)42 (27-57).009 Sex.001Male50 (30.12)1 (6.25)38 (28.57)11 (64.71)Female116 (69.88)15 (93.75)95 (71.43)6 (35.29)Comorbidities19 (11.45)1 (2.17)7 (6.80)11 (64.71)< .001 Signs and symptomsFever103 (62.05)086 (64.66)17 (100)< .001Cough81 (48.80)3 (18.75)63 (47.37)15 (88.24)< .001Fatigue51 (30.72)2 (12.50)41 (30.83)8 (47.06).099Dyspnea33 (19.88)019 (14.29)14 (82.35)< .001Sore throat31 (18.67)5 (31.25)25 (18.80)1 (5.88).190Myalgia29 (17.47)1 (6.25)16 (12.03)12 (70.50)< .001Headache18 (10.84)1 (6.25)14 (10.53)3 (17.65).555Nausea11 (6.63)09 (6.77)2 (11.76).351Diarrhea9 (5.42)07 (5.26)2 (11.76).406 LaboratoryLeukocyte < 3.5 × 109/L27 (16.27)1 (6.25)22 (16.54)4 (23.53).691Neutrophils < 1.8 × 109/L30 (18.07)3 (18.75)26 (19.55)1 (5.88).563Lymphocyte < 1.1 × 109/L48 (28.92)037 (27.82)11 (64.71)< .001Monocyte < 0.1 × 109/L2 (1.20)02 (1.50)0.914Eosinophils < 0.02 × 109/L63 (37.95)1 (6.25)49 (36.84)13 (76.47)< .001CRP > 10 mg/L34 (20.48)020 (15.04)14 (82.35)< .001SAA ≥ 10 mg/L89 (53.61)4 (25.00)68 (51.13)17 (100)< .001Abnormalities on CT imagingGround-glass opacity133 (88.67)0118 (88.72)15 (88.24).998Patchy shadowing119 (79.33)0102 (76.69)17 (100).024Interstitial abnormalities67 (44.67)052 (39.10)15 (88.24)< .001Crazy-paving pattern48 (32.00)032 (24.06)16 (94.12)< .001Consolidation51 (34.00)037 (27.82)14 (82.35)< .001Linear densities71 (47.33)056 (42.11)15 (88.24)< .001CT score, mean ± SD (range)3.0 ± 2.4 (1-14)02.3 ± 1.2 (1-7)8.3 ± 2.9 (5-14)< .001 OutcomesHospitalization97 (58.43)8 (50.00)79 (59.40)10 (58.82).771Discharge69 (41.57)8 (50.00)54 (40.60)7 (41.18)...Length of stay, mean ± SD, d16.7 ± 5.712.2 ± 4.618.0 ± 4.723.8 ± 5.0< 0.001Data are presented as No. (%) unless otherwise indicated. CRP = C-reactive protein; SAA = serum amyloid A. Open table in a new tab Data are presented as No. (%) unless otherwise indicated. CRP = C-reactive protein; SAA = serum amyloid A. Representative characteristics in this population included a higher proportion of young, prime-aged subjects, a majority of mild or moderate cases, feasibility of treatment within the "golden first week" of disease, and lower mortality compared with the general population. We describe here the COVID-19 infection pattern in medical staff in Wuhan for the first time, which featured various types of medical personnel involved even outside the red area. Here, red area was defined as where those diagnosed or suspected cases were isolated or treated. On the incidence curve, two peaks were observed (Fig 1), which coincided with the COVID-19 epidemic peaks in China.8National Health Commission of the PRCCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) situation reports.http://www.nhc.gov.cn/xcs/yqtb/list_gzbd.shtmlGoogle Scholar We attribute the first peak (January 20-26, 2020), at least partly, to the lack of knowledge regarding the disease, enforcement of procedures, and specialized COVID-19 wards, as well as inadequate personal protective equipment (PPE), especially for those outside the red area at the early stages of the COVID-19 outbreak. On January 20, 2020, the China CDC annouced that COVID-19 is categorized as B type infectious disease but with A type infectious disease management.9National Health Commission of the PRCAnnouncement of the National Health Commission of the People's Republic of China.http://www.nhc.gov.cn/xcs/zhengcwj/202001/44a3b8245e8049d2837a4f27529cd386.shtmlGoogle Scholar Prior to the announcement, workers in the red area were equipped with level 1 protection (disposable work cap, medical surgical mask, work clothes, disposable impermeable isolation clothing, and disposable latex gloves), whereas those outside the red area had no protection when dealing with patients on the front-line without effective COVID-19 screening. During this period, some nonclinical staff members were infected due to cross-infection in the hospital. We attribute the second peak (February 4-8, 2020) to close and frequent contact with COVID-19 patients with insufficient supply of PPE. When level 3 protection (disposable working cap, full-mask respirator or other respirator with positive air pressure, medical N95 mask, protective clothing, disposable latex gloves, and disposable shoe covers) was enforced in the red area, the infection was significantly reduced. To reduce the impact of medical runs (all medical resources concentrated on COVID-19 patients, which leads to lack of medical resources for non-COVID-19 patients) on non-COVID-19 patients, all clinical staff members outside the red area worked on the front-line. Due to the insufficient PPE supply, most of them were equipped with level 1 protection under the premise of COVID-19 screening. However, COVID-19 screening was not yet thorough enough, which resulted in noticeable infection among HCWs outside the red area. Similarly, with incomplete level 1 protection, nonclinical staff members provided logistics and administrative support for the main campus designated for non-COVID-19 patients, the east campus appointed for severe COVID-19 cases, the Wuchang mobile cabin hospital, and several medical assistance teams from other provinces, and a few were infected. After mid-February, PPE supply was compensated by government allocation and social donations, and protection of clinical workers outside the red area increased to level 2 (disposable working cap, goggles or protective screen, N95 mask, protective clothing and disposable latex gloves, and disposable shoe covers). Meanwhile, strict safety protocols, disinfection routines, and training programs were implemented and enforced. Few sporadic infections occurred thereafter. We draw some experiences and lessons from prevention of COVID-19 infection in the hospital. In each work area, regardless of whether it was in the red area, we set up three zones (infected, buffering, and cleaning zones) and two channels for staff and patients, respectively. Common outpatient clinics receive patients all by online time-segment appointment. We screened patients by using a "twice screening, twice buffering" strategy. First, in the outpatient department, patients with fever were shifted into fever clinics. Second, in the emergency ward, COVID-19 patients and carriers were screened by using CT imaging and blood testing and allocated to fever clinics. Prior to hospitalization, patients were housed temporarily in a specialized buffering ward for 3 days receiving symptomatic and supportive treatment. Patients were then transferred to the buffering zone of an ordinary ward for another 3 days and received professional treatment. This study has several limitations. In calculating infection rate, we used the total number of HCWs as the denominator, although not everyone underwent testing. Here we assumed that the staff members not tested were not infected under the principle of mandatory testing for symptomatic or suspected staff (or close contacts) and freewill testing for other staff. However, for potential missed cases with asymptomatic or atypical initial symptoms, or false-negative results of nucleic acid testing, we probably underestimated the infection rate. Instead, we may have overestimated the infection rate as not all HCWs have the same exposure risk in different health-care settings. In addition, the data from the medical staff infected with COVID-19 may vary dramatically in different hospitals with diverse missions in Wuhan. Even so, our study will be helpful in preventing COVID-19 in HCWs from other hospitals currently dealing with this pandemic. Role of sponsors: The sponsor had no role in the design of the study, the collection and analysis of the data, or the preparation of the manuscript

Integrated Infection Control Strategy to Minimize Nosocomial Infection of Coronavirus Disease 2019 among ENT Healthcare Workers.

Approaching Otolaryngology Patients During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Therapeutic and Triage Strategies for 2019 Novel Coronavirus Disease in Fever Clinics

Anesthetic Management of Patients with COVID 19 Infections during Emergency Procedures.

Epidemic control practices of an otolaryngology-head and neck surgery ward in an area with non-high inci-dence of COVID-19

Strengthening the Power of Nurses in Combating COVID‐19

Measures Taken to Alleviate the Impact of COVID‐19 Outbreak on Surgical Patients

Suggestions for Infection Prevention and Control in Digestive Endoscopy During Current 2019-Ncov Pneumonia Outbreak in Wuhan, Hubei Province, China

Fighting against coronavirus disease 2019 outbreak: improvement in anesthesia related infection control

[The Status of ENT Health Care Workers at the Forefront of Fighting Against COVID-19 in Wuhan and Some Response Options].

[Detection and evaluation of SARS-CoV-2 nucleic acid contamination in corona virus disease 19 ward surroundings and the surface of medical staff's protective equipment]

Protecting Healthcare Professionals During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Infection control in a department of anesthesiology during epidemic period of COVID 19: experience of Wuhan Union Hospital

Emergency Surgery in Suspected COVID-19 Patients with Acute Abdomen

Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-2019) Infection Among Health Care Workers and Implications for Prevention Measures in a Tertiary Hospital in Wuhan, China

Perceived infection transmission routes, infection control practices, psychosocial changes, and management of COVID-19 infected healthcare workers in a tertiary acute care hospital in Wuhan: a cross-sectional survey

Triaging patients in the outbreak of the 2019 novel coronavirus

Coronavirus Disease 2019 Infection among Medical Staff in Wuhan

Airway management strategies under the situation of prevention and control of nosocomial infections for coronavirus disease 2019

Pearls of experience for safe and efficient hospital practices in otorhinolaryngology—head and neck surgery in Hong Kong during the 2019 novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic

Otolaryngology Providers Must Be Alert for Patients with Mild and Asymptomatic COVID-19