LPA maintains innate antiviral immunity in a pro-active state via STK38L-mediated IRF3 Ser303 phosphorylation
Shuai Wang,Feng Chu,Ran Xia,Jizhong Guan,Lili Zhou,Xiuwu Fang,Tong Dai,Feng Xie,Long Zhang,Fangfang Zhou
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2022.111661
IF: 8.8
2022-11-23
Cell Reports
Abstract:Innate immunity is critical for the early detection and elimination of viral invasion. Extracellular signals are crucial for host resistance; however, how extracellular factors prepare the innate immunity for rapid antiviral response remains elusive. Here, we find that serum deprivation largely restricts the innate antiviral responses to RNA and DNA viruses. When serum is supplied, serine/threonine-protein kinase 38-like (STK38L), induced by serum response factor (SRF), phosphorylates IRF3 at Ser303, which prevents IRF3 from proteasome-mediated degradation in the rest state (non-infected), and ensures that enough IRF3 is called in the primed state (infected). STK38L-deficient mice exhibit compromised innate antiviral responses and elevated viral proliferation and mortality. Moreover, lysophosphatidic acid (LPA) or sphingosine 1-phosphate (S1P), the crucial activators of SRF, rescue immunosuppression caused by serum deprivation. These findings identify the SRF-STK38L-IRF3 axis as a novel mechanism that maintains the host in a pro-active state when not infected, which ensures the rapid immune response against virus. Introduction Type I interferon (IFN) is a sophisticated early line of defense used to combat viral infections. Mammalian cells sense viral invasion by germline-encoded pattern-recognition receptors, including Toll-like receptors (TLRs), acid-inducible gene I (RIG-I)-like receptors (RLRs), and several cytosolic DNA sensors. The RNA receptor RIG-I, melanoma differentiation-associated gene 5 (MDA5), and DNA sensors including cyclic GMP-AMP synthase (cGAS) recognize nucleic acids in the cytoplasm and then recruit their adaptor proteins, mitochondrial antiviral signaling protein (MAVS), and stimulator of IFN genes (STING) to initiate a series of signaling cascades that converge at the protein TANK-binding kinase 1 (TBK1) and IκB kinase ε (IKKε). TBK1 and IKKε phosphorylate and activate transcription factor IFN regulatory factor 3 (IRF3), resulting in the transcription of IFN-β as an initial response and subsequently switching to IRF7-induced IFN-α production. Type I IFNs (IFN-α and IFN-β), sequentially, induce the synthesis of a large number of antiviral IFN-stimulated genes (ISGs) and play a central role in intracellular antiviral defense. 1 Fischer S. Pattern recognition receptors and control of innate immunity: role of nucleic acids. Curr. Pharm. Biotechnol. 2018; 19 : 1203-1209 https://doi.org/10.2174/138920112804583087 Crossref PubMed Scopus (23) Google Scholar , 2 Ma Z. Damania B. The cGAS-STING defense pathway and its counteraction by viruses. Cell Host Microbe. 2016; 19 : 150-158 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chom.2016.01.010 Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (218) Google Scholar , 3 Marié I. Durbin J.E. Levy D.E. Differential viral induction of distinct interferon-alpha genes by positive feedback through interferon regulatory factor-7. EMBO J. 1998; 17 : 6660-6669 https://doi.org/10.1093/emboj/17.22.6660 Crossref PubMed Google Scholar Growing evidence suggests that nutritional status has important implications for host resistance to infection. 4 Wu D. Lewis E.D. Pae M. Meydani S.N. Nutritional modulation of immune function: analysis of evidence, mechanisms, and clinical relevance. Front. Immunol. 2018; 9 : 3160 https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2018.03160 < -Abstract Truncated-
cell biology