Randomized Double-Blind Clinical Trial of Moluodan () for the Treatment of Chronic Atrophic Gastritis with Dysplasia.

Xu-Dong Tang,Li-Ya Zhou,Shu-Tian Zhang,You-Qing Xu,Quan-Cai Cui,Li,Jing-Jing Lu,Peng Li,Fang Lu,Feng-Yun Wang,Ping Wang,Li-Qun Bian,Zhao-Xiang Bian
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11655-015-2114-5
IF: 2.9
2015-01-01
Chinese Journal of Integrative Medicine
Abstract:OBJECTIVE:To assess the efficacy and safety of Moluodan () in treating dysplasia in chronic atrophic gastritis (CAG) patients.METHODS:This was a multi-centered, double-blind, randomized controlled trial. The total of 196 subjects were assigned to receive either Moluodan or folic acid in a 2:1 ratio by blocked randomization. Mucosa marking targeting biopsy (MTB) was used to insure the accuracy and consistency between baseline and after 6-month treatment. Primary outcomes were histological score, response rate of pathological lesions and dysplasia disappearance rate. Secondary endpoints included gastroscopic findings, clinical symptom and patient reported outcome (PRO) instrument.RESULTS:Dysplasia score decreased in Moluodan group (P =0.002), significance was found between groups (P =0.045). Dysplasia disappearance rates were 24.6% and 15.2% in Moluodan and folic acid groups respectively, no significant differences were found (P =0.127). The response rate of atrophy and intestinal metaplasia were 34.6% and 23.0% in Moluodan group, 24.3% and 13.6% in folic acid group. Moluodan could improve erythema (P =0.044), and bile reflux (P =0.059), no significance between groups. Moluodan was better than folic acid in improving epigastric pain, epigastric suffocation, belching and decreased appetite (P <0.05), with symptom disappearance rates of 37% to 83%.CONCLUSIONS:Moluodan improved dysplasia score in histopathology, and erythema and bile reflux score in endoscopy, and superior to folic acid in improving epigastric pain, epigastric suffocation, belching and decreased appetite. [ChiCTR-TRC-00000169].
What problem does this paper attempt to address?