Magnetic Fields in Noninvasive Heart Stimulation: A Novel Approach for Anti-Atrial Fibrillation
Songyun Wang,Xiaoya Zhou,Zhuo Wang,Bing Huang,Liping Zhou,Mingxian Chen,Lilei Yu,Hong Jiang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcard.2015.04.155
IF: 4.039
2015-01-01
International Journal of Cardiology
Abstract:Atrial fibrillation (AF) is known to result from and result in changes in atrial electrophysiology, atrial tissue architecture, and the autonomic nervous system (ANS) [ [1] Shen M.J. Choi E.K. Tan A.Y. Lin S.F. Fishbein M.C. Chen L.S. et al. Neural mechanisms of atrial arrhythmias. Nat. Rev. Cardiol. 2012; 9: 30-39 Crossref Scopus (122) Google Scholar ]. Previous studies have established that intrinsic cardiac ANS and extrinsic cardiac ANS, such as ganglionated plexus and left stellate ganglion, play a key role in the initiation and maintenance of AF [ 2 Lu Z.B. Scherlag B.J. Lin J.X. Niu G.D. Fung K.M. Zhao L.C. et al. Atrial fibrillation begets atrial fibrillation autonomic mechanism for atrial electrical remodeling induced by short-term rapid atrial pacing. Circ. Arrhythm. Electrophysiol. 2008; 1: 184-192 Crossref PubMed Scopus (153) Google Scholar , 3 Sheng X. Scherlag B.J. Yu L. Li S. Ali R. Zhang Y. et al. Prevention and reversal of atrial fibrillation inducibility and autonomic remodeling by low-level vagosympathetic nerve stimulation. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2011; 57: 563-571 Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (104) Google Scholar , 4 Yu L.L. Scherlag B.J. Sha Y. Li S.L. Sharma T. Nakagawa H. et al. Interactions between atrial electrical remodeling and autonomic remodeling: how to break the vicious cycle. Heart Rhythm. 2012; 9: 804-809 Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (88) Google Scholar ]. Direct neural recording also demonstrated that simultaneous cardiac sympathovagal discharges are the most common triggers of paroxysmal atrial tachycardia and AF [ [5] Tan A.Y. Zhou S. Ogawa M. Song J. Chu M. Li H. et al. Neural mechanisms of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation and paroxysmal atrial tachycardia in ambulatory canines. Circulation. 2008; 118: 916-925 Crossref PubMed Scopus (251) Google Scholar ]. Low-level vagus nerve stimulation (VNS), however, may suppress atrial fibrillation by inhibiting cardiac ANS neural activity [ 4 Yu L.L. Scherlag B.J. Sha Y. Li S.L. Sharma T. Nakagawa H. et al. Interactions between atrial electrical remodeling and autonomic remodeling: how to break the vicious cycle. Heart Rhythm. 2012; 9: 804-809 Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (88) Google Scholar , 6 Shen M.J. Shinohara T. Park H.W. Frick K. Ice D.S. Choi E.K. et al. Continuous low-level vagus nerve stimulation reduces stellate ganglion nerve activity and paroxysmal atrial tachyarrhythmias in ambulatory canines. Circulation. 2011; 123: 2204-2212 Crossref PubMed Scopus (172) Google Scholar , 7 Li S. Zhou X. Yu L. Jiang H. Low level non-invasive vagus nerve stimulation: a novel feasible therapeutic approach for atrial fibrillation. Int. J. Cardiol. 2015; 182: 189-190 Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (11) Google Scholar ]. Currently, VNS is used to treat refractory epilepsy and has been extended to heart failure, ventricular arrhythmia and Alzheimer's disease [ 8 Thunsiri K. Shinlapawittayatorn K. Chinda K. Palee S. Surinkaew S. Chattipakorn S.C. et al. Application of vagus nerve stimulation from the onset of ventricular fibrillation to post-shock period improves defibrillation efficacy. Int. J. Cardiol. 2014; 176: 1030-1032 Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (6) Google Scholar , 9 He B. Lu Z. He W. Huang B. Jiang H. Similar effects of vagus nerve stimulation and atrial ganglionated plexi stimulation on ventricular effective refractory period and action potential duration in canine. Int. J. Cardiol. 2013; 168: 5116-5118 Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (4) Google Scholar ]. However, VNS and other stimulation modalities (such as spinal cord stimulation and carotid baroreceptor stimulation), which could cause a VNS-like effect, are implanted device-based. Despite their successes, there are still challenges when using implanted device-based stimulation in long-term studies, potentially due to the damage of the nerve and surrounding tissue, foreign body response from neural tissue and high-expense [ [10] Liu X. McCreery D.B. Bullara L.A. Agnew W.F. Evaluation of the stability of intracortical microelectrode arrays. IEEE Trans. Neural Syst. Rehabil. Eng. 2006; 14: 91-100 Crossref PubMed Scopus (68) Google Scholar ]. To address this, to explore a noninvasive stimulation that does not require direct contact to nerve is necessary.