Sitagliptin Attenuates the Progression of Coronary Atherosclerosis in Patients with Coronary Disease and Type 2 Diabetes

Bo Li,Yan-Rong Luo,Feng Tian,Yun-Dai Chen,Jin-Wen Tian,Yu Ding,Mei Zhu,Jing-Wei Li,Ying-Qian Zhang,Wei-Ming Shi
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2020.03.015
IF: 5.3
2020-01-01
Atherosclerosis
Abstract:Background and aims: Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is a well-recognized independent risk factor for ASCVD, the aim of this study was to investigate the effects of a dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor, sitagliptin, on prevention of progression of coronary atherosclerosis assessed by three-dimensional quantitative coronary angiography (3D-QCA) in T2DM patients with coronary artery disease (CAD). Methods: This was a prospective, randomized, double-center, open-label, blinded end point, controlled 18-month study in patients with CAD and T2DM. A total of 149 patients, who had at least 1 atherosclerotic plaque with 20%-80% luminal narrowing in a coronary artery, and had not undergone intervention during a clinically indicated coronary angiography or percutaneous coronary intervention, were randomized to sitagliptin group (n = 74) or control group (n = 75). Atherosclerosis progression was measured by repeat 3D-QCA examination in 88 patients at study completion. The primary outcome was changes in percent atheroma volume (PAV) from baseline to study completion measured by 3D-QCA. Secondary outcomes included change in 3D-QCA-derived total atheroma volume (TAV) and late lumen loss (LLL). Results: The primary outcome of PAV increased of 1.69% (95%CL, - 0.8%-4.2%) with sitagliptin and 5.12% (95%CL, 3.49%-6.74%) with the conventional treatment (p = 0.023). The secondary outcome of change in TAV in patients treated with sitagliptin increased of 6.45 mm(3) (95%CL,-2.46 to 6.36 mm(3)) and 9.45 mm(3) (95%CL,-4.52 to 10.14 mm(3)) with conventional treatment (p = 0.023), however, no significant difference between groups was observed (p = 0.175). Patients treated with sitagliptin had similar LLL as compared with conventional antidiabetics (- 0.06, 95%CL, - 0.22 to 0.03 vs. - 0.08, - 0.23 to - 0.03 mm, p = 0.689). Conclusions: In patients with type 2 diabetes and coronary artery disease, treatment with sitagliptin resulted in a significantly lower rate of progression of coronary atherosclerosis compared with conventional treatment.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?