Ticagrelor with or Without Aspirin Following Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in High-Risk Patients with Concomitant Peripheral Artery Disease: a Subgroup Analysis of the TWILIGHT Randomized Clinical Trial

Mitchell Krucoff,Alessandro Spirito,Usman Baber,Samantha Sartori,Dominick J. Angiolillo,Carlo Briguori,David J. Cohen,Timothy Collier,George Dangas,Dariusz Dudek,Javier Escaned,C. Michael Gibson,Ya-Ling Han,Kurt Huber,Adnan Kastrati,Upendra Kaul,Ran Kornowski,Vijay Kunadian,Birgit Vogel,Shamir R. Mehta,David Moliterno,Gennaro Sardella,Richard A. Shlofmitz,Samin Sharma,Philippe Gabriel Steg,Stuart Pocock,Roxana Mehran
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ahj.2024.03.002
IF: 5.099
2024-01-01
American Heart Journal
Abstract:Background The optimal antiplatelet regimen after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with peripheral artery disease (PAD) is still debated. This analysis aimed to compare the effect of ticagrelor monotherapy versus ticagrelor plus aspirin in patients with PAD undergoing PCI. Methods In the TWILIGHT trial, patients at high ischemic or bleeding risk that underwent PCI were randomized after 3 months of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) to aspirin or matching placebo in addition to open-label ticagrelor for 12 additional months. In this post-hoc analysis, patient cohorts were examined according to the presence or absence of PAD. The primary endpoint was Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) 2, 3, or 5 bleeding. The key secondary endpoint was a composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction (MI), or stroke. Endpoints were assessed at 12 months after randomization. Results Among 7,119 patients, 489 (7%) had PAD and were older, more likely to have comorbidities, and multivessel disease. PAD patients had more bleeding or ischemic complications than no-PAD patients. Ticagrelor monotherapy compared to ticagrelor plus aspirin was associated with less BARC 2, 3, or 5 bleeding in PAD (4.6% vs 8.7%; HR 0.52; 95%CI 0.251.07) and no-PAD patients (4.0% vs 7.0%; HR 0.56; 95%CI 0.45-0.69; interaction P -value .830) and a similar risk of death, MI, or stroke in these 2 groups (interaction P -value .446). Conclusions Despite their higher ischemic and bleeding risk, patients with PAD undergoing PCI derived a consistent benefit from ticagrelor monotherapy after 3 months of DAPT in terms of bleeding reduction without any relevant increase in ischemic events.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?