Alternate materials for the capture and quantification of gaseous oxidized mercury in the atmosphere

Livia Lown,Sarrah M. Dunham-Cheatham,Seth N. Lyman,Mae S. Gustin
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-2024-50
IF: 4.184
2024-06-20
Atmospheric Measurement Techniques
Abstract:Methodologies for identifying atmospheric oxidized mercury (Hg II ) compounds, including particulate-bound Hg II (Hg II (p) ) and gaseous oxidized mercury (Hg II (g) ), by mass spectrometry (MS) are currently under development. This method requires preconcentration of Hg II for analysis due to high instrument detection limits relative to ambient Hg II concentrations. The objective of this work was to identify and test materials for quantitative capture of Hg II from the gas phase, and to suggest potential surfaces onto which Hg II can be collected, thermally desorbed, and characterized using MS methods. From the literature, several compounds were identified as potential sorbent materials and tested in the laboratory for uptake of gaseous elemental mercury (Hg 0 ) and Hg II (g) (permeated from a HgBr 2 salt source). Chitosan, α-Al 2 O 3 , and γ-Al 2 O 3 demonstrated Hg II (g) capture in ambient air laboratory tests, without sorbing Hg 0 under the same conditions. When compared to cation exchange membranes (CEM), chitosan captured a comparable quantity of Hg II (g) , while ≤ 90 % of loaded Hg II (g) was recovered from α-Al 2 O 3 , and γ-Al 2 O 3 . When deployed in the field, the capture efficiency of chitosan decreased compared to CEM, indicating environmental conditions impacted the sorption efficiency of this material. The poor recovery of Hg II from the tested materials compared to CEM in the field indicate that further identification and exploration of alternative sorbent materials is required to advance atmospheric mercury chemistry analysis by MS methods.
meteorology & atmospheric sciences
What problem does this paper attempt to address?