Abstract:Abstract Background In contrast to the high cure rates in young patients (pts) treated with anthracycline-based chemotherapy, classical Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL) prognosis is poor in elderly pts, and very few data exist for pts considered too frail to receive standard-dose chemotherapy. In those patients, limited therapeutic options are available. Among the new immune-oncology drugs, Nivolumab, an anti-PD1 antibody, has demonstrated high response rate and very good tolerance, and is now approved in relapse and refractory (R/R) cHL. However, data on its use in the frontline setting are scarce. Material and methods We designed a prospective, open-label, multi-centric phase II study, to assess the efficacy and safety of nivolumab alone, or in combination with vinblastine in naive pts aged 61 years and older, with cHL and coexisting medical conditions. Pts were eligible if they had a Cumulative Illness Rating Scale-Geriatric (CIRS-G) score of 6 or more. Treatment consisted in an induction phase of 6 nivolumab injections, delivered at a flat dose of 240 mg every 14 days. Early assessment was done at 12 weeks by PET-CT and CT-scan. Pts who achieved complete metabolic response (CMR) at early assessment completed treatment with nivolumab monotherapy for 18 additional cycles (consolidation phase). Pts who obtained partial metabolic response (PMR) or non metabolic response (NMR, stable disease) received a combination of 18 cycles of nivolumab plus vinblastine, administered intravenously. The primary objective of the study was to assess the CMR rate based on central review at the end of treatment (EOT). Results From August 30th, 2018 to April 28 th, 2020, 64 pts were included in 31 centers, which composed the full analysis set (FAS), used for safety evaluation. Among these 64 pts, 56 pts were fully evaluable and constituted the efficacy set (ES) used for the efficacy analysis (8 pts progressed early or were not assessed by PET-CT). The median age at inclusion in the ES was 75 years [range: 62-91]. Patients had a median CIRS-G score of 10 [range: 6-18] at baseline, and a median G8 score of 12.5 [range: 6-17]. Seventy-three percent of pts had a stage III-IV disease and 42.9% of pts had B symptoms. At EOT, 16 pts (28.6%) achieved CMR according to central PET-CT review. Ten pts (17.9%) achieved PMR, 10 pts were in NMR (17.9%) and progressive metabolic disease was observed in 17 pts (30.4%). Three pts were not evaluated. The overall response rate at end of induction was 51.9%, (9 CMR and 18 PMR). 23 pts received a consolidation with nivolumab and vinblastine. With a median follow-up of 20.1 months, median PFS was 9.8 months [95% CI: 4.2;12]. 15/64 pts of the FAS died during treatment (23.4%): 6 pts from lymphoma, 2 pts from toxicity of study treatment and 2 pts from concurrent illness. One patient died from toxicity of additional treatment after progression, and 4 pts from other causes. The 2-year overall survival was 76.7% [95% CI: 59.6;87.3]. 49/64 pts (76.6%) experienced at least one AE, among which 32 pts experienced grade 3-4 AEs. The 3 more frequent grade 3-4 AEs were neutropenia (8 pts), sepsis (7 pts) and respiratory tract infection (5 pts). Adverse events were related to nivolumab in 36 pts and led to treatment discontinuation in 19 pts (29.7%). Adverse events of special interest i.e., immune-related AEs, were recorded in 22 pts, including 3 pneumonitis, 1 myocarditis, 1 encephalitis and 1 colitis. Among the 64 pts of the FAS, 34% of pts completed the treatment. The median number of cycles administered was 7 [range: 1-24] for nivolumab and 17 [range: 1-18] for vinblastine. Conclusion The NIVINIHO study is the first study to assess the efficacy and safety of an immune checkpoint inhibitor for first line therapy in elderly, frail patients with cHL. The results suggest that in this setting, a nivolumab-based therapy is active in a subset of pts. Further studies and biological analysis are planned to determine which patients may benefit from this approach. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Lazarovici: Mundipharma: Other: Travel grant. Bouabdallah: Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel/Accommodations/Expenses; Sandoz: Consultancy, Honoraria; Abbvie: Honoraria; Kite/Gilead: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel/Accommodations/Expenses; Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel/Accommodations/Expenses. Morschhauser: Roche: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Chugai: Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; AstraZenenca: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Genentech, Inc.: Consultancy; Genmab: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; AbbVie: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Honoraria; Epizyme: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Incyte: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BMS: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Servier: Consultancy; Gilead: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Laribi: Takeda: Other: Personal Fees, Research Funding; Novartis: Other: Personal Fees, Research Funding; AbbVie: Other: Personal Fees, Research Funding; BeiGene: Other: Personal Fees; Le Mans Hospital: Research Funding; IQONE: Other: Personal Fees; Astellas Phama, Inc.: Other: Personal Fees; AstraZeneca: Other: Personal Fees; Jansen: Research Funding. Feugier: Abbvie: Consultancy, Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Gilead: Consultancy, Honoraria; Astrazeneca: Consultancy, Honoraria. Sibon: iQone: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy; Abbvie: Consultancy; Roche: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy. Ribrag: Gilead: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; PharmaMar: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Servier: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Roche: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Roche: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Incyte: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Nanostring: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; AstraZeneca: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Argen-X: Research Funding; MSD Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Epizyme: Honoraria, Research Funding; Bristol Myers Squibb: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Astex Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; GSK: Research Funding; Infinity Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. OffLabel Disclosure: Nivolumab. Presently labelled for relapse and refractory classical Hodgkin lymphoma and other malignancies

Abstract:Introduction: Standard of care for patients (pts) with relapsed or refractory (RR) Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) is salvage therapy (tx) followed by autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). However, most pts with high-risk RR HL will relapse after HCT. The AETHERA study demonstrated that post-HCT consolidation with brentuximab vedotin (BV) in high-risk HL pts improved progression-free survival (PFS) compared to placebo, particularly in pts with 2+ risk factors (Moskowitz, 2018). Pts with prior BV exposure were excluded from AETHERA, and BV is increasingly used prior to HCT in HL. PD1 blockade is effective in pts with RR HL and PD1 monotherapy as post-HCT consolidation in HL resulted in promising 18 mo PFS (Armand, 2019). Combined BV and nivolumab (Nivo) is a safe and effective salvage tx in HL, therefore we conducted a multicenter phase 2 study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of BV-Nivo post-HCT consolidation in high risk RR HL. Methods: After HCT, adult pts with high-risk HL defined as having ≥ 1 of the following modified AETHERA risk factors were eligible: primary refractory HL, relapse < 1 year of completing initial tx, extranodal disease (dz) at relapse, B symptoms (sx) at relapse, requiring > 1 salvage tx, not in CR at HCT. Prior BV or PD1 blockade were allowed if pts were not refractory. Pts underwent HCT according to institutional standards at the 5 centers. Starting between day 30-75 after HCT, pts received 1.8 mg/kg of BV and 3mg/kg nivo q21 days for a planned 8 cycles. If 1 drug was discontinued due to toxicity, the other could be continued. Investigators assessed response and progressive disease (PD) according to the 2014 Lugano classification. The primary endpoint was 18 mo PFS from study tx initiation. Secondary endpoints were overall survival (OS), safety, and the response rate in pts not in complete response (CR) at baseline. Results: 59 pts were enrolled and treated with at least one dose of study tx. Baseline characteristics are listed in Table 1. 18 (31%) pts were primary refractory, 35 (59%) had early relapse, 23 (39%) had extranodal dz and 14 (24%) had B sx at relapse, 15 (25%) received > 1 salvage tx before HCT, and 48 (81%) were in CR at HCT. 21 (36%) had 1 modified AETHERA risk factor, 23 (40%) had 2 and 14 (24%) had 3+ risk factors. The median follow-up time from study tx initiation was 15.7 months (range, 2.8-35.5). Patients initiated BV-nivo a median 54 days from HCT (range, 34-75) and received a median of 8 cycles (range, 1-8). 29 (49%) pts completed all 8 cycles of BV and nivo and 45 (76%) patients completed 8 cycles of one drug. 14 (24%) pts discontinued both BV and nivo early, including 6 for adverse events (AE), 6 pt withdrawals, 1 pt lost to follow-up, and 1 pt death from PJP pneumonia unrelated to study tx. BV was discontinued in 8 (14%) pts - due to grade (gr) 3 peripheral neuropathy (PN) in 2 pts, gr 2 PN in 2 pts, carpal tunnel syndrome in 1 pt, gastrointestinal AEs in 2 pts, and infusion related reaction in 1 pt. Nivo was discontinued in 7 (12%) pts - due to pneumonitis in 2 pts, and colitis, elevated bilirubin, abnormal transaminases, pneumonia with elevated creatinine, and hypotension with fever in 1 pt each. BV was dose reduced to 1.2mg/kg in 11 (19%) pts, 9 pts for PN, and 1 each for neutropenia and arthralgia. The most common AEs related to BV-Nivo consolidation were PN (51%, 3% gr 3), neutropenia (42%, 31% gr 3-4), fatigue (37%), diarrhea (29%, 3% gr 3), nausea (25%, 2% gr 3), arthralgia (24%), AST elevation (24%, 2% gr 3). The most frequent gr 3-4 AEs were neutropenia (31%), pneumonitis (7%), and ALT elevation (5%). Immune-related (ir) AEs requiring systemic corticosteroids occurred in 18 (31%) patients. Most common Gr 2 or higher irAEs included: pneumonitis (12%), AST or ALT elevation (8%), hypothyroidism (5%), and rash (3%). 6 pts were not in CR at baseline after HCT (all PR). 5 pts converted to CR with study tx and 1 pt remained in PR without PD. There were only 2 PFS events, 1 pt with relapse at 15 months and PJP-related death after prophylaxis was self-discontinued. The estimated 18 mo PFS and OS in all patients were 95% and 98%, respectively. The estimated 18 mo PFS in pts with 2+ and 3+ risk factors were 92% and 89%, respectively. Conclusions: Post-HCT consolidation with BV-Nivo in pts with high-risk RR HL is a promising approach, with only 1 relapse observed in our cohort with short follow-up thus far. Post-HCT BV-Nivo was tolerable, though IrAEs were observed more frequently than in the pre-HCT setting and PN and neutropenia were common. Disclosures Herrera: Pharmacyclics: Research Funding; Karyopharm: Consultancy; AstraZeneca: Research Funding; Gilead Sciences: Consultancy, Research Funding; Immune Design: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Genentech, Inc./F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd: Consultancy, Research Funding; Merck: Consultancy, Research Funding; Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Other: Travel, Accomodations, Expenses, Research Funding. Nieto:Affimed: Consultancy, Other: Grant Support; Secura Bio: Other: Grant Support; Novartis: Other: Grant Support; Astra Zeneca: Other: Grant Support. Holmberg:Sanofi: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Research Funding; Millenium-Takeda: Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding; UpToDate: Patents & Royalties: Royalties; Janssen: Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding. Mei:Sanofi: Consultancy; Morphosys: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Chen:Autolus Therapeutics: Current Employment. Rosen:Abbvie: Speakers Bureau; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy; NeoGenomics: Consultancy; Aileron Therapeutics: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Pebromene: Consultancy; Celgene: Speakers Bureau; paradigm Medical Communications: Speakers Bureau. Kwak:CJ Healthcare: Consultancy; Xeme Biopharma/Theratest: Other: equity; Sellas Life Sciences Grp: Consultancy; Enzychem Life Sciences: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Antigenics: Other: equity; InnoLifes, Inc: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pepromene Bio: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celltrion Healthcare: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celltrion, Inc.: Consultancy. Feldman:Portola: Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding; Kyowa Kirin: Consultancy, Research Funding; Eisai: Research Funding; Cell Medica: Research Funding; Amgen: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Honoraria, Other, Speakers Bureau; Abbvie: Honoraria; Bayer: Consultancy, Honoraria; Trillium: Research Funding; Janssen: Speakers Bureau; Viracta: Research Funding; Rhizen: Research Funding; Corvus: Research Funding; BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Kite: Honoraria, Other: Travel expenses, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding; Takeda: Honoraria, Other: Travel expenses; Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel expenses, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; AstraZeneca: Consultancy. OffLabel Disclosure: Nivolumab is not FDA-approved for use as consolidation after autologous stem cell transplantation

Nivolumab+AVD in Advanced-Stage Classic Hodgkin's Lymphoma

Brentuximab Vedotin, Nivolumab, Doxorubicin, and Dacarbazine for Advanced-Stage Classical Hodgkin Lymphoma

Phase II Trial of Nivolumab Plus Doxorubicin, Vinblastine, Dacarbazine as Frontline Therapy in Older Adults With Hodgkin Lymphoma

Concurrent pembrolizumab with AVD for untreated classic Hodgkin lymphoma

Nivolumab-AVD Is Better Tolerated and Improves Progression-Free Survival Compared to Bv-AVD in Older Patients (Aged ≥60 Years) with Advanced Stage Hodgkin Lymphoma Enrolled on SWOG S1826

A PILOT TRIAL OF ADRIAMYCIN, PEMBROLIZUMAB, VINBLASTINE AND DACARBAZINE (APVD) FOR PATIENTS WITH UNTREATED CLASSICAL HODGKIN LYMPHOMA

Progression-Free Survival (PFS) and Toxicity with Nivolumab-AVD Compared to Brentuximab Vedotin-AVD in Pediatric Advanced Stage (AS) Classic Hodgkin Lymphoma (cHL), Results of SWOG S1826

Sequential pembrolizumab and AVD are highly effective at any PD-L1 expression level in untreated Hodgkin lymphoma

Nivolumab Versus Chemotherapy in Patients with Advanced Oesophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma Refractory or Intolerant to Previous Chemotherapy (ATTRACTION-3): a Multicentre, Randomised, Open-Label, Phase 3 Trial

Incorporating Monoclonal Antibodies into the First-Line Treatment of Classical Hodgkin Lymphoma

Nivolumab for adults with Hodgkin's lymphoma (a rapid review using the software RobotReviewer).

Nivolumab First-Line Therapy for Elderly, Frail Hodgkin Lymphoma Patients: Niviniho, a Lysa Phase II Study

Nivolumab (anti-PD-1; BMS-936558; ONO-4538) in patients with advanced solid tumors: Survival and long-term safety in a phase I trial.

Response-adapted anti-PD1 based salvage therapy for Hodgkin lymphoma with nivolumab +/- ICE (NICE)

[Translated article] Real-world effectiveness and safety of nivolumab in patients with relapsed or refractory classical Hodgkin lymphoma

Treatment Strategies in Advanced-Stage Hodgkin Lymphoma

Consolidation with Nivolumab and Brentuximab Vedotin after Autologous Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation in Patients with High-Risk Hodgkin Lymphoma

Efficacy and Safety of Pembrolizumab and Chemotherapy in Newly-Diagnosed, Early Unfavorable or Advanced Classic Hodgkin Lymphoma: The Phase 2 Keynote-C11 Study

Advanced stage classic Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL): biology, clinical features, therapeutic approach, and management at relapse

Real-World Multicenter Study of PD-1 Blockade in HIV-Associated Classical Hodgkin Lymphoma Across the United States

Post-marketing surveillance of the safety and effectiveness of nivolumab for classic Hodgkin lymphoma in Japan