The Hydroxyl Moiety on Carbon One (C1) in the Monoterpene Nucleus of Thymol is Indispensable for Anti-Bacterial Effect of Thymol

Alex Boye,Justice Kwaku Addo,Desmond Omane Acheampong,Ama Kyeraa Thomford,Emmanuel Asante,Regina Elorm Amoaning,Dominic Nkwantabisa Kuma
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e03492
IF: 3.776
2020-01-01
Heliyon
Abstract:Background: Thymol, a natural monoterpene phenol is not only relevant clinically as an anti-microbial, antioxidant and anti-inflammatory agent but also holds the prospect as a natural template for pharmaceutical semi-synthesis of therapeutic agents. It is a major component of essential oils from many plants. Evidence abound linking overall bioactivity of thymol to its monoterpene nucleus, specifically, the hydroxyl (-OH) substituent on carbon number one (C1) on the monoterpene nucleus. Other studies have posited that the overall bioactivity of thymol is not substantially altered by chemical modification of - OH on the C1 of the monoterpene nucleus. In view of this, it is still unclear as to whether removal or modification of the -OH on C1 of the monoterpene nucleus relates generally or context-dependently to bioactivity of thymol. Objective: The present study investigated anti-bacterial effects of ester-and-ether substituted derivatives of thymol on S. aureus, P. aeruginosa and E. coli. Materials and methods: twelve ester-and-ether substituted derivatives of thymol (6TM1s and 6TM2s) were synthesized and characterized by using HPLC, Mass spectrometry, and IR techniques. Anti-bacterial activity of the 12 thymol derivatives was evaluated using broth macrodilution and turbidimetric methods against pure clinical isolates (S. aureus, P. aeruginosa and E. coli). Standard anti-biotics used were Thymol Streptomycin and flucloxacillin, while DMSO was used as vehicle for thymol derivatives. MIC and MBC were determined. Results: Thymol produced broad-spectrum growth inhibition on all isolates. At equimolar concentrations, thymol and reference drugs produced concentration-dependent growth inhibition against the isolates (Staphylococcus aureus, Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Escherichia coli) compared to DMSO. Although the growth inhibitory effects of the ester-and-ether derivatives of thymol was significant (P <= 0.05) compared to DMSO, it was however insignificant (P >= 0.05) compared to thymol and reference antibiotics. Comparatively, at equimolar concentrations, ester-substituted derivatives of thymol, particularly the branched chain derivative (TM1C) produced more effective growth inhibition on the isolates than the ether-substituted derivatives of thymol. Thymol was twice as potent (MIC and MBC, 500 mu g/ml) than both ester-and-ether substituted derivatives of thymol (MIC and MBC, > 1000 mu g/ml) on all the three clinical isolates. Increase in side chain bulkiness of -OH moiety on the monoterpene nucleus of thymol decreased growth inhibition on isolates. Conclusion: Thymol has demonstrated broad-spectrum anti-bacterial effects attributable to the hydroxyl moiety on C1 of the monoterpene nucleus. Structural modification of the hydroxyl moiety on C1 of the monoterpene nucleus of thymol with either ether-or-ester substitutions yielded no significant anti-bacterial effects.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?