The Effects of Intensive Glycemic Control on Clinical Outcomes Among Patients With Type 2 Diabetes With Different Levels of Cardiovascular Risk and Hemoglobin A 1c in the ADVANCE Trial.

Jingyan Tian,Toshiaki Ohkuma,Mark Cooper,Stephen Harrap,Giuseppe Mancia,Neil Poulter,Ji-Guang Wang,Sophia Zoungas,Mark Woodward,John Chalmers
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2337/dc19-1817
2020-01-01
Diabetes Care
Abstract:OBJECTIVE To study whether the effects of intensive glycemic control on major vascular outcomes (a composite of major macrovascular and major microvascular events), all-cause mortality, and severe hypoglycemia events differ among participants with different levels of 10-year risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) and hemoglobin A(1c) (HbA(1c)) at baseline. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS We studied the effects of more intensive glycemic control in 11,071 patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D), without missing values, in the Action in Diabetes and Vascular Disease: Preterax and Diamicron Modified Release Controlled Evaluation (ADVANCE) trial, using Cox models. RESULTS During 5 years' follow-up, intensive glycemic control reduced major vascular events (hazard ratio [HR] 0.90 [95% CI 0.83-0.98]), with the major driver being a reduction in the development of macroalbuminuria. There was no evidence of differences in the effect, regardless of baseline ASCVD risk or HbA(1c) level (P for interaction = 0.29 and 0.94, respectively). Similarly, the beneficial effects of intensive glycemic control on all-cause mortality were not significantly different across baseline ASCVD risk (P = 0.15) or HbA(1c) levels (P = 0.87). The risks of severe hypoglycemic events were higher in the intensive glycemic control group compared with the standard glycemic control group (HR 1.85 [1.41-2.42]), with no significant heterogeneity across subgroups defined by ASCVD risk or HbA(1c) at baseline (P = 0.09 and 0.18, respectively). CONCLUSIONS The major benefits for patients with T2D in ADVANCE did not substantially differ across levels of baseline ASCVD risk and HbA(1c).
What problem does this paper attempt to address?