Outcomes of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation versus intensive chemotherapy in patients with myeloid sarcoma: a nationwide representative multicenter study
Jie Sun,Yi-Cheng Zhang,Jia Wei,Ya-Jing Xu,Yue Zhang,Yu-Hua Li,An-Qin Wu,Lei Fan,Yu Zhu,Feng-Qi Liu,Zhong-Xing Jiang,Chao Liu,Ming Jiang,Jian-Hua Qu,Peng-Cheng He,Jie Wang,Xiao-Bing Huang,Rong Xiao,Su-Jun Gao,Qiang Guo,San-Bin Wang,Xiao-Ping Li,Sheng-Jin Fan,Li-Li Sun,Lan-Ping Xu,Xiao-Jun Huang,Xiao-Hui Zhang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41409-024-02485-y
2024-12-04
Bone Marrow Transplantation
Abstract:Myeloid sarcoma (MS) is a rare hematological neoplasm with poor prognosis, posing a significant clinical challenge due to the absence of effective and standardized treatments. We conducted a retrospective analysis of 162 MS patients treated at 12 centers to compare outcomes between intensive chemotherapy and allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT). Our analysis revealed that allo-HSCT demonstrated superior overall survival (OS) within the initial 36 months compared to intensive chemotherapy alone ( p = 0.037). However, beyond 36 months (36–60 months), a reverse trend was observed ( p = 0.056). Subgroup analysis revealed potential benefit for isolated MS patients with allo-HSCT, but not for those with leukemic MS. Additionally, in patients achieving first complete remission (CR1) after induction chemotherapy, allo-HSCT did not significantly improve 5-year OS compared with intensive chemotherapy alone ( p = 0.25). Conversely, allo-HSCT significantly improved 5-year OS in non-CR1 patients ( p < 0.001). Notably, HLA-matched HSCT and haploidentical HSCT showed comparable outcomes in terms of OS, disease-free survival, and cumulative incidence of relapse. In conclusion, allo-HSCT improved outcomes for MS patients within 36 months of disease onset, and haploidentical HSCT emerged as a viable treatment option for patients without matched donors.
oncology,immunology,hematology,transplantation