Early Detection of the Wood-boring Insect Semanotus Bifasciatus Using Acoustic Detection Technology
qi jiang,Yujie Liu,Lili Ren,Yu Sun,Youqing Luo
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-1069664/v1
2021-11-23
Abstract:Abstract BACKGROUND: Semanotus bifasciatus Motschulsky (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae) is one of the most destructive wood-boring pests of Platycladus trees in East Asia, threatening the protection of ancient cypress species and urban ecological safety. Acoustic detection technology has the advantages of high sensitivity, single wood diagnosis and anti-interference, which can be useful for early identification of cryptic wood boring damage. However, there has been limited research on detection time window and acoustics features that suitable for early detection of forest wood borers. METHODS: In this study, we carried out a manipulated insect infestation experiment by inoculating S. bifasciatus into fresh logs, and the feeding sound signals of S. bifasciatus larvae were recorded in timeseries. Then, nine feature variables were selected to characterize the sounds of larval feeding activity. The best time window for acoustic detection during a single day and the whole larval growth stage was determined. And the optimal models for predicting larval instar and population were established using the stepwise regression (SR) and partial least squares regression (PLSR) approach. RESULTS: (1) The single pulse duration of S. bifasciatus was less than 15 ms, and the peak frequency was approximately 8 kHz; (2) Within a 24-hour day, the feeding sound signals were strongest during 13:00 and 20:00; (3) The feeding activity of larvae was greatest during the 1st to the 3rd instar, declined from the 4th instar, and was lowest at the 5th instar; (4) Weak correlations were found between larval instar and feature variables, r ranging from 0.3 to 0.6. By contrast, the larval population has a strong linear correlation with all variables ( r >0.7). Except for Average pulse duration and Peak frequency, there indicated high or severe multicollinearity among other variables (the variance inflation factor, VIF >10); (5) The SR model was optimal for predicting larval instar; its prediction accuracy was R 2 = 0.71, RMSEp = 0.42, and RPD = 3.38. Average entropy, Peak frequency, and Average pulse duration had the largest influence on the model. (6) The optimal model for predicting population was the PLSR model, and its prediction accuracy was R 2 = 0.97, RMSEp = 61.96, and RPD = 28.87. Except for Peak Freq, the other eight variables had a great impact on the model. CONCLUSION: This study highlighted the suitable detection time window and acoustic feature variables for early identification of S. bifasciatus larvae, and optimal models for predicting its larval instar and population were provided. This work will promote further improvements in the efficiency and accuracy of acoustic detection technology for practical applications, providing a reference for evaluating the early damage of wood-boring pest.