Safe and successful intubation using a Storz video laryngoscope in management of pediatric difficult airways
F. Xue,M. Tian,X. Liao,Y. C. Xu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-9592.2008.02753.x
2008-12-01
Paediatric Anaesthesia
Abstract:SIR—We read, with great interest, the recent letter written by Drs Wald et al. (1) regarding pediatric Storz video laryngoscope (SVL) (Karl Storz, Tuttlingen, Germany) rescue for a difficult intubation in a neonate with Desbuquois syndrome who has a poor glottic view by direct laryngoscopy. We agree with their view that the SVL may serve as a useful alternative when a pediatric difficult airway is encountered, but we would like to make one comment on the anesthesia scheme of this case, and offer a few suggestions on safe and successful intubation using the SVL in management of pediatric difficult airways. For neonates, infants and younger children with a difficult airway, sevoflurane inhalational anesthesia with maintenance of spontaneous ventilation is indeed preferred because child’s airway can be tested by a gradual onset of anesthesia during induction (2). This ensures that child’s airway can safely managed by facemask. In this case, however, 1.2 mgÆkg of propofol was supplemented i.v. after an equilibrated end-tidal concentration of sevoflurane equal to 1.5 minimum alveolar concentration was obtained (1). It puts the patient at increased risk of severe adverse incidents because the spontaneous breathing disappears and ‘cannot intubate–cannot ventilate’ situation occurs (3), especially when propofol is rapidly administered i.v. in pediatric patients. When our plan is to attempt laryngoscopy and intubation under sevoflurane anesthesia, therefore, the inspired concentration of sevoflurane is initially increased gradually to 8%. After the end-expired concentration of sevoflurane reaches 5% or the child’s spontaneous ventilation starts to become shallow, laryngoscopy and intubation are performed. We find that spontaneous breathing can not only be well maintained during anesthesia induction, but also no episodes of breath-holding and coughing are observed during laryngoscopy and intubation (2). As compared to the convenient laryngoscope, the SVL may indeed provide a better glottic view because it can capture images from beyond the tip of the blade and display them on monitors. Moreover, the operators experienced in the convenient laryngoscope can also use the SVL skillfully without any special training because the two devices share some common features. The operator needs only a few cases to become comfortable with the view on the monitor screen, appropriate eye-hand coordination, and the handling characteristics of the instrument. Therefore, it can be used as a primary intubation device or in case of emergency since it does not require extensive patient preparation or personnel assistance when urgent intubation is required. However, several key points for safe and successful intubation using a SVL must be emphasized. 1 When the intubation is performed using the SVL, a malleable intubating style and an adequate angulation of the endotracheal tube (ETT) are necessary for guidance of the ETT tip towards the glottis, especially in the pediatric patients with a micrognathia or an anterior larynx. To avoid airway trauma, a less traumatic and more flexible intubating stylet is preferred. Also the distal end of ETT and intubating stylet is usually bent anteriorly to an angle of 60–90 according to the anatomy of a child’s airway. 2 The SVL presented does not contain a port for suctioning or administering oxygen during intubation. This may not only shorten available time for intubation by apneic oxygenation, but also increases the susceptibility to problems inherent to endoscopes in general, such as fogging of the lens or interference with secretions and blood. Before intubation, therefore, sufficient preoxygenation is required, the SVL blade should be well pretreated with an anti-fog agents and the airway must be satisfactory suctioned. Additionally, the duration of each intubation attempt can not last too long, and SpO2 and ECG must be closely monitored, particular at the neonates and infants with high oxygen consumption relative to reserves. 3 Over-deep insertion of the SVL blade is a common problem, particularly when a Miller SVL blade is used in the infants and smaller children in whom the upper airway is very short. Inserting the SVL blade too deeply into the laryngopharynx may elevate the entire larynx so that the opening of esophagus will be visualized on the monitor rather than the glottis. This problem can be avoided by inserting the SVL blade gradually to make base of tongue, uvula and epiglottis being visualized sequentially on the monitor. 4 When a Macintosh SVL blade tip is placed into epiglottic vallecula, the epiglottis may occasionally obstructs the view to the glottis, especially if the epiglottis is large and floppy. To obtain the adequate exposure of the glottis, the epiglottis has to be gently lifted directly by the Macintosh SVL blade tip. When the laryngeal exposure is also done using the SVL, the external laryngeal manipulation is an effective measure to improve visualization of the vocal cords. 5 An adequate monitor view of the vocal cords can often be obtained rapidly using the SVL, but insertion of the ETT into the trachea may be significantly delayed due to the limited manoeuvrability of the ETT within the oropharynx, which makes it necessary to re-adjust the angle of the ETT tip. As compared to adults, this problem is easier to occur in children because of the smaller oropharyngeal space. It can be, partially, overcome by insertion and steering of the ETT from the angle of the mouth, which increases the sagittal manoeuvrability of the ETT tip. 6 For the patients who can be ventilated but have a failed laryngoscopic intubation, beside the SVL, the fiberCORRESPONDENCE 1251