Abstract:Directional distance function (DDF), an evaluation technique that estimates relative efficiency of a decision making unit (DMU) along a pre-determined direction vector that is not restricted by the radial direction, has been widespread in productive efficiency research over the past two decades. A key challenge in DDF applications, however, is to decide on an appropriate (or the best) direction along which to measure efficiency. To circumvent this issue, we build on the DDF model and propose expected efficiency in efficiency estimation. Expected efficiency is defined as the mean value of all relative efficiency scores of a DMU along all directions. When calculating the overall relative efficiency score of a DMU, the expected efficiency model incorporates all possible directions rather than choosing a particular direction. As such, the expected efficiency approach extends DDF from a single direction to all directions. Some benefits of the expected efficiency approach include (1) relieving a decision maker of the burden of determining a particular directional vector among many choices; (2) overcoming a decision maker’s subjectivity in the direction selection; (3) resolving the sensitivity issue caused by choosing different directions; and (4) ensuring that all DMUs are estimated in a consistent and equitable manner. Our study contributes to productive efficiency research and data envelopment analysis by introducing a new efficiency estimate that does not need to rely on one specific direction. Using two examples, we demonstrate the validity and the robustness of expected efficiency as an alternative efficiency estimate.

Performance Ranking Method Based on Superefficiency with Directional Distance Function in DEA

A cross-dependence based ranking system for efficient and inefficient units in DEA

Selecting Common Projection Direction In Dea Directional Distance Function Based On Directional Extensibility

Ranking DMUs by Using Interval Efficiencies in Data Envelopment Analysis

Efficiency Intervals, Rank Intervals and Dominance Relations of Decision-Making Units with Fixed-Sum Outputs

DEA Super Efficiency Evaluation Model Based on the Complete Envelopment Frontier

PREFERENCE VOTING AND RANKING USING DEA GAME CROSS EFFICIENCY MODEL(Operations Research for Performance Evaluation)

Ranking Decision Making Units Based on the Weight Set

Additive Integer-Valued DEA Models with Fuzzy Undesirable Outputs: Closest Benchmarking Targets and Super-Efficiency

Ranking Decision Making Units Using Common-Weight DEA Model

DEA Ranking Method Based Upon Virtual Envelopment Frontier and TOPSIS

Performance Evaluation of Pallet Rental Companies: A Non-Oriented Super-Efficiency Integer-Valued DEA Model.

DEA Cross-Efficiency Aggregation with Deviation Degree Based on Standardized Euclidean Distance

Expected Efficiency Based on Directional Distance Function in Data Envelopment Analysis.

Cross-direction Environmental Performance Evaluation Based on Directional Distance Function in Data Envelopment Analysis

A Range Adjusted Measure of Super-Efficiency in Integer-Valued Data Envelopment Analysis with Undesirable Outputs

Shannon DEA Efficiency Model Based on Two Envelopment Frontiers

Efficiency ranking with common set of weights based on data envelopment analysis and satisfaction degree.

Determination of Cross-Efficiency under the Principle of Rank Priority in Cross-Evaluation

A complete ranking of DMUs with undesirable outputs using restrictions in DEA models

An Integrated DEA Ranking Method Based upon Benchmarking Sets