Identification of Potential Key Genes in Gastric Cancer Using Bioinformatics Analysis

Wei Wang,Ying He,Qi Zhao,Xiaodong Zhao,Zhihong Li
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3892/br.2020.1281
2020-01-01
Biomedical Reports
Abstract:Gastric cancer (GC) is one of the most common types of cancer worldwide. Patients must be identified at an early stage of tumor progression for treatment to be effective. The aim of the present study was to identify potential biomarkers with diagnostic value in patients with GC. To examine potential therapeutic targets for GC, four Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) datasets were downloaded and screened for differentially expressed genes (DEGs). Gene Ontology and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) analyses were subsequently performed to study the function and pathway enrichment of the identified DEGs. A protein-protein interaction (PPI) network was constructed. The CytoHubba plugin of Cytoscape was used to calculate the degree of connectivity of proteins in the PPI network, and the two genes with the highest degree of connectivity were selected for further analysis. Additionally, the two DEGs with the largest and smallest log Fold Change values were selected. These six key genes were further examined using Oncomine and the Kaplan-Meier plotter platform. A total of 99 upregulated and 172 downregulated genes common to all four GEO datasets were screened. The DEGs were primarily enriched in the Biological Process terms: ‘extracellular matrix organization’, ‘collagen catabolic process’ and ‘cell adhesion’. These three KEGG pathways were significantly enriched in the categories: ‘ECM-receptor interaction’, ‘protein digestion and absorption’, and ‘focal adhesion’. Based on Oncomine, expression of ATP4A and ATP4B were downregulated in GC, whereas expression of the other genes were all upregulated. The Kaplan-Meier plotter platform confirmed that upregulated expression of the identified key genes was significantly associated with worse overall survival of patients with GC. The results of the present study suggest that FN1, COL1A1, INHBA and CST1 may be potential biomarkers and therapeutic targets for GC. Additional studies are required to explore the potential value of ATP4A and ATP4B in the treatment of GC.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?