Influence of Polarized Reflection on Airborne Remote Sensing of Canopy Foliar Nitrogen Content

Siyuan Liu,Bin Yang,Zihan Zhang,Yun Xiang,Taixia Wu,Yunsheng Zhao,Feizhou Zhang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01431161.2020.1718242
IF: 3.531
2020-01-01
International Journal of Remote Sensing
Abstract:Radiation detected by sensors can reveal information regarding canopy structure and leaf surface properties. It has been shown that the scattering coefficient (W-lambda), a 'pure' spectrum obtained after correction for the effect of canopy structure on the bidirectional reflectance factor (BRF), can provide information about biochemical composition; e.g. nitrogen content, more objectively. However, specular radiation reflected from leaf surface (without any information from the leaf interior) has a potential influence on W-lambda and thus consequently affects the estimation of canopy nitrogen content (CNC). The so-called specular reflection influence has rarely been studied. Polarized reflectance (R-p), as part of the specular reflectance, was used to assess this kind of influence. To model the accurate R-p within the study area, six bidirectional polarization distribution function (BPDF) models were intercompared, using the existing POLDER/PARASOL R-p database, to produce R-p for three vegetation types: needleleaf, broadleaf, and mixed forest. Then, correction for polarized reflection and canopy structure was made to yield a more reasonable and accurate W-lambda. An efficient interval partial least-squares regression (iPLSR) method for CNC estimation was used to analyse the impact of polarized reflection on both the 400 nm-2,500-nm canopy W-lambda and CNC estimation. The results showed that the contribution of polarization was greater in the strong-absorption spectral region, with an influence on W-lambda estimation of up to 25% and 28% in the visible and short-wave infrared regions, respectively. Also, improvements of 0.93% in average regarding the relative mean square error of cross-validation (RMSECV) were seen in CNC estimation accuracy. Moreover, sensitivity analyses of BPDF model parameters, and of the fixed total number of intervals in the iPLSR were also conducted. Improvements with an average of 1.19% regarding the RMSECV was consistently seen in the accuracy of CNC regression after polarization correction, no matter how many fixed intervals were. The results also gave guides on the selection of spectral regions used to estimate forest CNC.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?