Abstract:The authors propose a Centre‐Loss approach to solve a class verification task that requires a single forward‐pass during inference. The Centre‐Loss method is validated on the publicly available dataset Fruits 360 and the self‐collected Self‐Checkout products image dataset. Its verification uses a single forward‐pass, whereas accuracy tantamounts to state‐of‐the‐art Siamese. Siamese networks excel at comparing two images, serving as an effective class verification technique for a single‐per‐class reference image. However, when multiple reference images are present, Siamese verification necessitates multiple comparisons and aggregation, often unpractical at inference. The Centre‐Loss approach, proposed in this research, solves a class verification task more efficiently, using a single forward‐pass during inference, than sample‐to‐sample approaches. Optimising a Centre‐Loss function learns class centres and minimises intra‐class distances in latent space. The authors compared verification accuracy using Centre‐Loss against aggregated Siamese when other hyperparameters (such as neural network backbone and distance type) are the same. Experiments were performed to contrast the ubiquitous Euclidean against other distance types to discover the optimum Centre‐Loss layer, its size, and Centre‐Loss weight. In optimal architecture, the Centre‐Loss layer is connected to the penultimate layer, calculates Euclidean distance, and its size depends on distance type. The Centre‐Loss method was validated on the Self‐Checkout products and Fruits 360 image datasets. Centre‐Loss comparable accuracy and lesser complexity make it a preferred approach over sample‐to‐sample for the class verification task, when the number of reference image per class is high and inference speed is a factor, such as in self‐checkouts.

Quadruplet-Center Loss for Face Verification

A Loss Combination Based Deep Model for Person Re-Identification

Discriminatively Learning for Representing Local Image Features with Quadruplet Model

Learning Local Feature Descriptors with Quadruplet Ranking Loss

InterFace:Adjustable Angular Margin Inter-class Loss for Deep Face Recognition

Margin Loss: Making Faces More Separable

Triplet-Center Loss Based Deep Embedding Learning Method for Speaker Verification

Angle-based Softmax Loss for Face Verification

Center-push Loss for Joint View-Based 3D Model Classification and Retrieval Feature Learning

Deep Representation for Partially Occluded Face Verification

Concentric Ring Loss for Face Forgery Detection

Triplet Decoupling Network for Masked Face Verification

Dual Distance Center Loss: the Improved Center Loss That Can Run Without the Combination of Softmax Loss, an Application for Vehicle Re-Identification and Person Re-Identification

Quadruplet Loss For Improving the Robustness to Face Morphing Attacks

A Lightweight Face Verification Based on Adaptive Cascade Network and Triplet Loss Function

Triplet Angular Loss for Pose-Robust Face Recognition

Qamface: quadratic additive angular margin loss for face recognition

Triplet Loss-less Center Loss Sampling Strategies in Facial Expression Recognition Scenarios

Deep Face Recognition Using Adaptively-Weighted Verification Loss Function.

Uniformface: Learning Deep Equidistributed Representation For Face Recognition

Centre‐loss—A preferred class verification approach over sample‐to‐sample in self‐checkout products datasets