Tuina for cervical vertigo: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Fan Huang,Siyi Zhao,Lin Dai,Zitong Feng,Zhennan Wu,Jia Chen,Rusong Guo,Qiang Tian,Zhiyong Fan,Shan Wu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ctcp.2020.101115
IF: 3.577
2020-01-01
Complementary Therapies in Clinical Practice
Abstract:Abstract Background and purpose Cervical vertigo (CV), one of the most common causes of vertigo, makes patients feel dizzy, which seriously affects patients’ lives. As a traditional Chinese bone-setting manipulation, Tuina is widely used to treat CV. This article aims to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of Tuina for CV. Methods Nine databases were searched. Methodological quality was evaluated with the Cochrane Collaborationu0027s tool. Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) was applied to determine confidence in the effect estimates. Stata 12.0 software was used to carry out the meta-analysis, and a trial sequential analysis (TSA) was performed with TSA 0.9. Results Nine randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were included. Low-quality evidence suggested that Tuina showed a significantly higher effectiveness rate compared to massage therapy (risk ratio (RR) = 1.11, 95% confidence intervals (CI): 1.05 to 1.17, p  Conclusion Tuina might improve the effectiveness rate and ESCV scores in patients with CV. However, the level of all the available evidence was low, and larger-scale and well-designed RCTs should be encouraged.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?