Single-Molecule Tracking of Transcriptional and Translational Machinery in Stationary Phase E. Coli

Yanyu Zhu,Mainak Mustafi,James C. Weisshaar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpj.2019.11.2984
IF: 3.4
2020-01-01
Biophysical Journal
Abstract:The majority of bacteria in nature spend most of their lifetime in nutrient-limited stationary phase. The spatial distribution and dynamics of the transcriptional and translational machinery in stationary phase are not well studied. We applied single-particle tracking and superresolution microscopy to study the spatial distribution and dynamics of DNA, RNAP and ribosomes for bacteria in both exponential phase and 48-hour stationary phase. We found heterogeneity in DNA distribution in stationary phase cells, with about 80% of cells in 2.3-2.5 μm cell length range having one nucleoid lobe and 20% having two nucleoid lobes. The apparent diffusion coefficient of DNA loci on a 100-s timescale decreases by a factor of 3.8 in stationary phase compared to exponential phase. RNAP and HU spatial distributions show strong overlap, indicating RNAP can access the nucleoid region in stationary phase cell whose nucleoid is condensed by the Dps protein. The RNAP diffusion coefficient Dapp increases from 0.043 μm2-s−1 in exponential phase to 0.103 μm2-s−1 in stationary phase. Monte Carlo simulations indicate that the fraction of DNA-bound RNAP decreases from 72% in exponential phase to 49% in stationary phase on the 30-ms timescale, indicating less transcription in stationary phase cell. Our results confirmed the conclusion from the previous in vitro assays that DNA condensation by Dps is decoupled from transcriptional regulation. This could give bacteria under stress the freedom to regulate transcriptional patterns while protecting the genome. Ribosomes are concentrated in the two end caps and the annular region surrounding the nucleoid lobes, strongly segregated from DNA in stationary phase. The increase of ribosome diffusion coefficient Dapp from 0.035 μm2-s−1 in exponential phase to 0.080 μm2-s−1 in stationary phase is consistent with less translation in stationary phase cell.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?