Radiomics To Predict Response To Pembrolizumab In Patients With Advanced Rare Cancers

Rivka R. Colen,Sara Ahmed,Nabil Elshafeey,Daniel D. Karp,Shubham Pant,Vivek Subbiah,Sarina Anne Piha-Paul,David S. Hong,Timothy A. Yap,Siqing Fu,Apostolia Maria Tsimberidou,Bettzy Stephen,Jing Gong,Jordi Rodon Ahnert,Aung Naing
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2020.38.5_suppl.66
IF: 45.3
2020-01-01
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Abstract:66 Background: To predict responders versus non-responders to Pembrolizumab, an anti PD-1 monoclonal antibody, in patients with advanced rare cancers. Methods: The study included 58 patients with advanced rare cancers (eg. squamous cell carcinoma of the skin, adrenocortical carcinoma, carcinoma of unknown primary, and paraganglioma) who were enrolled in a phase 2 trial of Pembrolizumab. Tumor response was evaluated using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) 1.1. Patients were categorized into: 21 responders (stable disease, partial response, and complete response) and 37 non-Responders (progressive disease). Target lesion(s) obtain from standard-of-care, pre-treatment contrast enhanced CT scans were segmented using 3D slicer v4.8.1. A total of 610 features (10 histogram-based and 600 second-order texture features) were calculated from each extracted volume of interest (VOI). Radiomic features were obtained using a feature selection approach based on Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO). Selected features were used to build a classification model, using XGboost, for prediction of tumor response to Pembrolizumab. To evaluate the robustness of the estimates, Leave-One-Out Cross-Validation (LOOCV) was performed. Results: A total of 10 radiomic features were selected; the XGboost-based classification robustly differentiated between responders vs non-responders (area under the curve, sensitivity and specificity were 99%, 100%, and 95%, respectively [p<0.0001]). Conclusions: Our radiomic derived features were able to identify imaging differences that can evaluate patients’ response to Pembrolizumab treatment.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?