Prediction of Hepatic Metastasis and Relapse: Concordance Analysis among Noninvasive Liver Fibrosis Scores from Colorectal Cancers

Sanjun Cai,Xiang Hu,Weixing Dai,Yaqi Li,Xiaoji Ma,Junjie Peng
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2020.38.4_suppl.202
IF: 45.3
2020-01-01
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Abstract:202 Background: Liver fibrosis, resulted from several liver diseases, are increasing up to 25% in population globally. It remains undetermined how much of an impact liver fibrosis have on the development of hepatic metastasis and relapse in colorectal cancer (CRC). Hence the aim of this study was to clarify the role of liver fibrosis on hepatic metastasis and relapse in CRC undergoing curative therapy. Methods: We enrolled consecutive 1652 patients with radical surgery as the discovery cohort, and the validation set enrolled 432 CRC patients with hepatic metastasis treatment. To determine the degree of liver fibrosis, the NFS, FIB4 and APRI were applied. The influence of liver fibrosis on hepatic metastasis and relapse was assessed by survival analyses. Nomograms with fibrosis score incorporated was established to identify the incremental value for individualized relapse estimation, which was then assessed with respect to calibration, discrimination, and clinical usefulness. Results: The high liver fibrosis score patients had significantly worse outcomes than low score in 5-year hepatic metastasis (22.6 vs . 8.7%) in discovery cohort, and RFS (58.2 vs. 44.1%) in validation cohort. Multivariate analysis revealed liver fibrosis score as an independent prognostic factor. The distribution analysis also demonstrated higher liver fibrosis score a powerful prognostic factor for hepatic metastasis and relapse. Incorporating the liver fibrosis score into the nomogram resulted in better performance evaluated by C-index and AUC than TNM staging system and clinicopathologic nomograms. Importantly, in validation cohort, the discriminatory capacity of the fibrosis score incorporated was superior to that of the CRS score in predicting RFS, as demonstrated by the C-index and AUC. The concordance study showed well agreement among NFS, FIB4 and APRI in predicting DFS and RFS. Among these three noninvasive liver fibrosis scores, NFS score performed the best in predicting hepatic specific DFS and RFS. Conclusions: The liver fibrosis was a powerful predictor of hepatic specific DFS and RFS in CRC. Fibrosis niche may be a favorable microenvironment for metastatic formation in the liver.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?