Abstract:Abstract Collecting large asset managers’ capital market assumptions, we revisit the relationships between subjective equity premium expectations, equity valuations, and financial portfolios. In contrast to the well-documented extrapolative expectations of retail investors, asset managers’ equity premium expectations are countercyclical: they are high (low) when valuations are low (high). We find that asset managers’ portfolios reflect their heterogeneous expectations: allocation funds of asset managers with larger U.S. equity premium expectations invest significantly more in U.S. equities. The sensitivity of portfolios to expectations seems to be muted by investment mandates and is smaller than the one predicted by a standard portfolio choice model.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The main problems that this paper attempts to solve are:
1. **The relationship between subjective equity premium expectations and market valuation and portfolio**: The paper explores how the subjective equity premium expectations of large asset management companies (i.e., institutional investors) are related to market valuation, and whether these expectations are reflected in their portfolio allocations. Specifically, the author studies whether the equity premium expectations of these institutional investors are counter - cyclical, that is, higher when the market valuation is low and lower when the market valuation is high.
2. **Comparison with existing literature**: The paper also attempts to compare the expectations of institutional investors with the expectation research on individual investors (retail investors) in the existing literature. Existing research shows that the expectations of individual investors are usually pro - cyclical, that is, high when the market valuation is high and low when the market valuation is low. Therefore, the author hopes to test whether this finding applies to institutional investors by studying the expectations of institutional investors.
3. **Sensitivity of portfolio to expectations**: In addition, the paper also explores the sensitivity of the portfolio allocation of institutional investors to their subjective expectations. By analyzing the portfolios of the funds (especially allocation funds) managed by these institutions, the author evaluates their response degree to equity premium expectations. This helps to understand whether the behavior of institutional investors is consistent with their expectations and what factors affect this consistency, such as investment mandates.
### Main findings
- **Counter - cyclical equity premium expectations**: Different from individual investors, the equity premium expectations of institutional investors are counter - cyclical, that is, higher when the market valuation is low and lower when the market valuation is high. This is consistent with the relationship between the actual excess equity return and the valuation ratio predicted based on historical data.
- **Portfolio allocation reflects expectations**: The portfolio allocation of institutional investors does reflect their expectations, but this sensitivity is limited by investment mandates and is lower than the prediction of the standard portfolio selection model.
- **Heterogeneity of long - term expectations**: There is significant heterogeneity in the long - term equity premium expectations of institutional investors. This heterogeneity is related to the change of market valuation to a certain extent, but there are also persistent individual differences.
### Methods
- **Data sources**: The author collected the assumed data of the capital market from the public reports of 45 institutional investors and investment advisors, focusing on 22 institutions that manage allocation funds.
- **Portfolio data**: Using Morningstar data, the portfolio allocation of US - registered allocation funds managed by these institutions was analyzed.
- **Other data**: Including Shiller's CAPE ratio, option - implied equity premium data, Treasury bond yields, etc.
### Conclusions
- The equity premium expectations of institutional investors are counter - cyclical with market valuation, which is in sharp contrast to the pro - cyclical expectations of individual investors.
- Portfolio allocation does reflect the expectations of institutional investors, but this sensitivity is limited by investment mandates and is lower than the prediction of theoretical models.
- The heterogeneity of long - term equity premium expectations indicates that there are significant individual differences in the expectation formation of institutional investors.
Through these findings, the paper provides a new perspective for understanding the behavior of institutional investors and challenges the existing asset - pricing models.