Abstract:Introduction Divided narratives pose long‐standing difficulties in physician and patient communication. In decision‐making on cancer treatment, divided narratives between physicians and patients hinder mutual understanding and agreement over the illness and its treatment. For effective decision‐making on treatments, it is necessary to investigate the similarities and differences in these divided narratives. Methods This study adopted a qualitative research design of narrative inquiry to examine the data, which included interviews with 32 cancer patients and 16 paired physicians in two hospitals in China. Data analysis was conducted using grounded theory to generate findings. Results Both physicians and patients were concerned about goals and obstacles to their decision‐making on cancer treatment. Four common aspects of goal setting were identified from the divided narratives: decision pools, treatment goals, identity practice and preferred identity. Four common obstacles were identified: pains and trust, communication gap, financial issues and complex family. However, the meanings attached to these eight aspects differed between physicians and patients. Conclusion Cancer treatment decision‐making is an encounter of the scientific world and lifeworld. A divided narrative approach can identify the similarities and differences in the decision‐making on cancer treatment between physicians and patients. Physicians generally adopt a rational decision‐making approach, whereas patients generally adopt a relational decision‐making approach. Despite the common concerns in their goals and obstacles, physicians and patients differed in their contextualized interpretations, which demonstrates the physicians' and the patients' pursuit of preferred identities in decision‐making. The results of this study provide a new perspective to treatment decision‐making, emphasizing the importance of narrative integration in reaching mutual agreement. Patient and Public Contribution The findings were shared with 15 cancer patients and caregivers for feedback and advice in June 2024. This study was also presented at the international conferences of COMET (International and Interdisciplinary Conference on Communication, Medicine, and Ethics) and ICCH (International Conference on Communication in Healthcare) 2023 for continuous feedback and comments.

Who Decides? Shared Decision-Making among Colorectal Cancer Surgery Patients in China

Patients’ Views of Shared Decision Making in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: a Survey in China

Decision-making among the Substitute Decision Makers in Intensive Care Units: an Investigation of Decision Control Preferences and Decisional Conflicts

Status quo of advanced cancer patients participating in shared decision-making in China: a mixed study

When western concept meets eastern culture: Exploring the impact of Confucianism on shared decision-making in China

Shared decision-making and its influencing factors among parents of children with cancer in China: A cross-sectional study

The Preliminary Research on "Shared Decision-Making" Model:taking an example of cancer treatment

Exploring shared decision-making needs in lung cancer screening among high-risk groups and health care providers in China: a qualitative study

OP126 Shared Decision-Making Influences Patients’ Adoption Of Stents In China

Behaviour, Barriers and Facilitators of Shared Decision Making in Breast Cancer Surgical Treatment: A Qualitative Systematic Review Using a ‘best Fit’ Framework Approach

Decisional Conflict, Patient Involvement, and the Associated Psychological Factors Relating to Mastectomy Decisions among Women with Breast Cancer

The Willingness of Chinese Cancer Patients Toward Participating in Medical Decision-Making

The willingness and actual situation of Chinese cancer patients and their family members participating in medical decision-making.

Factors Influencing the Degree of Participation in Surgical Decision-Making among Chinese Patients with Prostate Cancer: A Qualitative Research

Physician–patient Shared Decision Making, Patient Satisfaction, and Adoption of New Health Technology in China

Patient Preferences and Shared Decision Making for the Traditional Chinese Medicine Treatment of Lung Cancer: A Discrete Choice Experiment Study.

Frequency and Influencing Factors of Shared Decision Making among Breast Cancer Patients Receiving Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Physicians' Perspective on Shared Decision-making:a Qualitative Study

The Encounter of Two Worlds: Divided Narratives of Decision‐Making on Cancer Treatment Between Physicians and Patients

Association Between Primary Decision-Maker and Care Intensity Among Patients With Advanced Cancer in Mainland China

Association Between Primary Decision-Maker and Care Intensity for Patients with Advanced Cancer in Mainland China