Clinical Efficacy of Tuina Therapy for Acute Lumbar Sprain: A Bayesian Network Meta-Analysis Based on Randomized Controlled Trials
Jing Chen,Songtao Liu,Zhichao Gong,Xiang Feng,Wu Li,Jiangshan Li
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2147/jpr.s494234
IF: 2.8319
2024-12-18
Journal of Pain Research
Abstract:Jing Chen, 1– 4 Songtao Liu, 2, 3 Zhichao Gong, 4 Xiang Feng, 1 Wu Li, 1 Jiangshan Li 1, 4 1 School of Acupuncture, Tuina and Rehabilitation, Hunan University of Chinese Medicine, Changsha, Hunan, People's Republic of China; 2 College of Medical Imaging Laboratory and Rehabilitation, Xiangnan University, Chenzhou, Hunan, People's Republic of China; 3 Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, The Affiliated Hospital of Xiangnan University, Chenzhou, Hunan, People's Republic of China; 4 Department of Acupuncture, Tuina and Rehabilitation, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Hunan University of Chinese Medicine, Changsha, Hunan, People's Republic of China Correspondence: Jiangshan Li; Wu Li, School of Acupuncture, Tuina and Rehabilitation, Hunan University of Chinese Medicine, No. 300, Xueshi Road, Yuelu District, Changsha, Hunan, 410208, People's Republic of China, Tel +86 13707315642 ; +86 13574851647, Fax +8673188458187, Email ; Purpose: Traditional Chinese medicine possesses distinct advantages in the treatment of acute lumbar sprains, and Tuina (Chinese massage) is a commonly employed therapeutic method. This study employed a Bayesian meta-analysis to assess the efficacy and safety of Tuina therapy for acute lumbar sprain with the aim of providing more evidence-based medical substantiation for clinical practice. Patients and Methods: Randomized controlled trials of Tuina therapy for acute lumbar sprains published in CNKI, CSPD, CCD, CBM, PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science were searched up to August 7, 2024. The included studies were assessed for the risk of bias using Cochrane's randomized controlled trial bias risk assessment tool. Results: Eleven studies involving 810 patients were included in this meta-analysis. Two types of interventions were included: Tuina alone and Tuina combined with conventional treatment. The included studies had a low risk of bias. Three outcome indicators were analyzed. The results of the network meta-analysis showed that, compared with conventional treatment, Tuina alone or in combination with other interventions had a significant advantage in terms of efficacy (P < 0.05). The order of the surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) was: Tuina (0.79) and Tuina combined with conventional treatment (0.70). Regarding the visual analog scale score, Tuina combined with the other interventions showed significant advantages (P < 0.05). The order of SUCRA was: Tuina combined with conventional treatment (0.80), followed by Tuina alone (0.64). Regarding the modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association scores, Tuina combined with conventional treatment had a significant advantage (P < 0.05). The order of SUCRA was Tuina combined with conventional treatment (0.98), followed by Tuina alone (0.26). Conclusion: The results suggest that Tuina has significant advantages over conventional treatment. Keywords: acute lumbar sprain, Tuina, efficacy, systematic review, Bayesian network meta-analysis Acute lumbar sprain (ALS), a prevalent clinical condition that frequently affects young and middle-aged individuals, particularly those engaged in heavy manual labor, involves the acute tearing of soft tissues, including muscles, fascia, and ligaments, caused by sudden excessive external forces that commonly occur during the forceful contraction of the lumbar muscles during exercise or heavy lifting. 1 The primary clinical manifestations of this condition include severe back pain, localized pain, and limited spinal mobility. 2 ALS is a prevalent clinical condition that frequently affects young and middle-aged individuals, particularly those engaged in heavy manual labor. The incidence rate is higher in males than in females. 3 According to survey results, approximately 60–80% of young individuals and manual laborers experience ALS. This common health issue significantly affects quality of life and work capacity. 4 Failure to promptly and effectively treat the disease in its acute phase can lead to chronicity, imposing a greater burden on patients. Currently, Western medicine advocates the use of analgesics and anti-inflammatory medications, pain-point blockades, and muscle relaxants for the symptomatic treatment of ALS. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), such as ibuprofen and acetaminophen, are considered the primary pharmacological agents in Western medicine for the management of ALS. 5 NSAIDs effectively alleviate pain by inhibiting cyclooxygenase activity and suppressing prostaglandin synthesis. Muscle relaxants are also commonly employed in ALS treatment to relieve symptoms by impeding nerve impulse conducti -Abstract Truncated-
clinical neurology