(331) DOES VARICOCELECTOMY INCREASE THE SUCCESS RATE OF MICRODıSSECTION TESTICULAR SPERM EXTRACTION OPERATION IN NON-OBSTRUCTIVE AZOOSPERMIC MEN?

Dr Kadir C Sahin,Dr Mehmet H Gultekin,Prof Hamdi Ozkara,Prof Emre Akkus
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jsxmed/qdae041.055
2024-06-15
The Journal of Sexual Medicine
Abstract:Objectives Varicocele is detected on physical examination in some non-obstructive azoospermic (NOA) men. However, the current literature is not clear about the effect of varicocelectomy on sperm retrieval rates (SRR) in microdissection testicular sperm extraction (mTESE) in NOA men. Our aim was to investigate the effect of varicocele on SRR rates in patients whom we performed mTESE operations due to NOA in our clinic. Methods The data of patients who underwent mTESE operation between 2000 and 2019 in our clinic were retrospectively analyzed. Along with clinical and demographic data, patients' SRR were compiled. Patients with Klinefelter's disease, solitary testis, or missing data were excluded from the study. The results were comparatively analyzed with SPSS v.25 (Armonk, NY: IBM Corp.). Results In our clinic, 651 patients who underwent mTESE between the specified dates and who satisfied the exclusion and inclusion criteria were included in the study. 224 patients were diagnosed with varicocele and 90 (40.17%) of these patients underwent varicocelectomy operation. Of the varicocelectomy operations, 78 (86.67%) were unilateral and 12 (13.33%) were bilateral. The SRR of patients who underwent mTESE based on varicocele absence/presence and varicocelectomy history were given in table. Analysis of the data from these three groups revealed that there was no statistically significant difference in SRR between varicocele diagnosis and varicocelectomy (p=0.99). Conclusions According to the results of our study, neither the presence of varicocele nor the history of varicocelectomy had a positive or negative impact on the SRR of the patients. Therefore, care should be taken in the decision-making process, particularly in patients who have varicocele and are candidates for mTESE. Conflicts of Interest All authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
urology & nephrology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?