Interpolated or Satellite-Based Precipitation? Implications for Hydrological Modeling in a Meso-Scale Mountainous Watershed on the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau

Ling Zhang,Dong Ren,Zhuotong Nan,Weizhen Wang,Yi Zhao,Yanbo Zhao,Qimin Ma,Xiaobo Wu

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.124629

IF: 6.4

2020-01-01

Journal of Hydrology

Abstract:The interpolation algorithms and the satellite-based precipitation products (SPPs) are two major approaches to estimating spatially distributed precipitation. This would inevitably raise the questions: whether the interpolation algorithms could outperform the SPPs or vice versa? And what's the implications for hydrological modeling? These questions, however, have received little attention in the literature. This study compared the performances of two quasi-physically based interpolation algorithms (i.e., MicroMet and PrecLaps) with the widely used SPPs, i.e., Tropical Rainfall Measuring Mission Multisatellite Precipitation Analysis (TMPA) and Integrated Multi-Satellite Retrievals for Global Precipitation Measurement (IMERG), in and around the Babao River Basin (BRB), a meso-scale mountainous watershed on the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau. Meanwhile, the hydrological utilities of the interpolated and the satellite-based precipitation were evaluated by using the Distributed Hydrology Soil Vegetation Model (DHSVM). Results indicate that TMPA and IMERG perform worse than the interpolation algorithms in estimating daily precipitation, while they show comparable and even higher performance in reproducing monthly precipitation. Both the interpolation algorithms and the SPPs have an obvious lower performance in winter than the other seasons. DHSVM with the TMPA-based or IMERG-based precipitation, when not subjected to additional calibration, performs worse than those with the interpolated precipitation in simulating streamflow. Nevertheless, interestingly, the ET simulations consistently match well with the independent remote sensing (RS)-based ET product, as indicated by the higher coefficient of determination (R-2 >= 0.85) and Nash-Sutcliffe efficiency (NSE >= 0.72). The additional calibration of DHSVM with the satellite-based precipitation could enhance the streamflow simulation accuracy substantially, with the NSE increasing by 70.59-132% in the validation period. This, however, would bring about larger discrepancies between the simulated and the RS-based ET in summer. The study further discussed the implications of these findings for hydrological modeling over the data-scarce mountainous watersheds, and revealed the uncertainties associated with the rain gauge density.