Proteomic Predictors of Outcome after Adjuvant Anti-Hormonal Therapy for Hormone Receptor-Positive Breast Cancer

B. Hennessy,D. Faratian,Z. Ju,A. Lluch-Hernandez,S. Myhre,M. Gonzalez-Angulo,J. Overgaard,J. Alsner,A. Borresen-Dale,G. B. Mills
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/s0923-7534(20)32838-6
IF: 51.769
2012-01-01
Annals of Oncology
Abstract:ABSTRACT Purpose This study aimed to identify predictive proteomic biomarkers of outcome in women with estrogen and/or progesterone receptor-positive (ER/PR-positive) breast cancer after adjuvant tamoxifen, with sufficient power to alter patient management. Methods Using reverse phase protein arrays (RPPA), 140 antibodies were applied to a training set of 197 ER/PR-positive breast cancers to identify predictors. An algorithm was developed that predicted patient outcomes using a subset of antibodies. Since RPPA is a useful exploratory tool but does not lend itself as a practical clinical tool to assay validated biomarkers, quantitative immunofluorescence for selected proteins was applied to 313 ER/PR-positive breast cancers (test set) for validation. Seventy-seven other ER/PR-positive cancers with transcriptional profiling data were used to compare the performance of the proteomic biomarkers and established genomic predictors. All patients were treated with adjuvant tamoxifen after loco-regional therapy. Results Two different combinations (4-protein/3-protein models) of four proteins (CCNB1/PAI1/PR/BCL2), subdivided lymph node-negative breast cancer patients into low-, medium- and high-risk groups with significantly different 10-year recurrence-free survival. The proteomic markers predicted 10-year distant metastasis-free survival in lymph node-negative patients in the test set in the low-, medium- and high-risk groups as follows: 0.9, 0.8, 0.7 (4-protein model (p = 0.05)), 0.91, 0.8, 0.74 (3-protein model (p = 0.004)), with 74%/64% patients in the low-risk groups, respectively. The proteomic models outperformed clinical variables and genomic predictors in multivariate analyses. Conclusion This study validates proteomic biomarkers that can be assayed in a practical inexpensive manner using immunofluorescence to identify lymph node-negative ER/PR-positive patients with excellent outcomes after adjuvant tamoxifen. Disclosure All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?