Single-center Experience of Neoadjuvant Therapy with Gemcitabine and S-1 for Borderline Pancreatic Cancer

Ying Peng,Dianrong Xiu,Zhaolai Ma,Bin Jiang,Chunhui Yuan,Hangyan Wang,Lei Li
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hpb.2019.10.2153
IF: 3.842
2019-01-01
HPB
Abstract:Introduction: The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant gemcitabine plus S-1 (GS) chemotherapy for patients with borderline pancreatic carcinoma. Method: The clinicopathological data of 19 patients diagnosed as borderline resectable pancreatic cancer who were admitted to the Peking University Third Hospial between April 2017 and Augest 2018 were collected. 19 patients were treated with gemcitabine plus S-1 (gemcitabine 1000mg/m2, D1 and D8; S-1 40~60mg,Bid,D1~14, repeat the regimen every 3 weeks) as neoadjuvant chemotherapy. After the completion of neoadjuvant chemotherapy, patients were evaluated operation feasibility and developed surgical planning in 4 weeks. Demographic data including response rates, treatment related toxicities, pathological, perioperative outcomes were collected.R1 was defined as tumor cells are within 1mm of the margins. Result: 19 patients received chemotherapy with a median cycle of 4 cycles(range, 2~6 cycles). 7 patients had partial remission, 5 patients had stable disease and 7 patients had progressive disease. No grade 4~5 toxicities were noted. 8 patients received radical resection including 4 receiving panereaticoduodenectomy, 2 receiving distal pancreatectomy with splenectomy, 2 receiving total pancreatectomy. 2 patients received portal vein and superior mesenteric vein resection and reconstruction, 2 patients received coeliac trunk resection. Four patients received R0 resection and 4 received R1 resection. 4 patients with postoperative complications were improved by conservative treatment, including 2 with pancreatic fistula, 1 with delayed gastric empty, 1 with lympha fistula. Conclusion: Gemcitabine plus S-1 as neoadjuvant chemotherapy for borderline resectable pancreatic cancer is safe and effective, and patients can tolerate mild adverse reactions.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?